Stephen Miller didn’t exactly give people a neat end date. Speaking Wednesday evening, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy warned that the war involving Iran could drag on “indefinitely” unless the Iranian regime capitulates to President Donald Trump’s demands.
The contrast is glaring. Trump has said the conflict would likely run four to five weeks, but Miller argued that the naval blockade around Iranian ports could keep squeezing the country’s economy far longer than that timeline suggests. “This embargo is squeezing the economic life out of the Iranian regime, and the United States has the capacity to continue this indefinitely if Iran chooses the wrong path,” Miller told Fox News host Sean Hannity.
What Miller leaned into was leverage—like, the whole “we have options and we’re using them” pitch. Like other Trump administration officials, he boasted about U.S. military strength, asserting America has “all of the cards” in negotiations with the regime and is pressuring Iran to stop its nuclear enrichment program. He also said Trump wants peace and a deal, but won’t allow Iran to pursue or achieve weapons—adding that this embargo and “every other option is on the table,” with a brief pause on the word “final.”
Miller’s role matters because he’s one of the administration’s most commanding voices reinforcing the president’s agenda and threats. And even as he insists the U.S. “wants peace,” he’s also been clear about consequences if Iran doesn’t comply—bolstering Trump’s threat to bomb Iran’s infrastructure. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth echoed that line Thursday morning, urging Iran to “choose wisely” or face the wrath of the U.S. military, including a blockade and bombing of infrastructure.
There’s also the background everyone keeps circling back to: Trump has said he wants to eliminate Iran as a threat to the U.S. and others by forcing the regime to end nuclear enrichment to prevent a nuclear weapon. But the first round of negotiations between the U.S. and Iran faltered and ended in no deal. After that announcement last week, Trump sounded more upbeat about Iran’s proposed 10-point peace plan, calling it “workable”—and for a moment the conflict’s end still sounded close, maybe manageable. Then the order came: by Monday, the president had enforced a blockade on Iranian ports.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent added to the pressure Thursday, saying Wednesday that the U.S. has other plans to strain Iran’s economy further, including by imposing secondary sanctions on countries buying Iranian oil. Misryoum newsroom reporting also notes that Pakistan is expected to host a second round of peace talks sometime in the future, though a date isn’t clear—so, not exactly a calming “soon” on the horizon. Meanwhile, Americans are eager for the president to end the war in Iran. Surging oil prices and a shaky stock market are feeding anxiety, and one Misryoum newsroom analysis points to poll data: a Reuters/Ipsos poll, conducted in March, found that 66 percent of respondents want the U.S. to end the war even if it means not achieving the administration’s goals.
On a day like this—when the talk is all about timelines and leverage—you can almost feel the urgency in the air. Even at home, people keep refreshing screens, waiting for any signal that “indefinitely” might not mean what it sounds like. And maybe that’s the point—because once the blockade is framed as capable of lasting forever, everything else becomes harder to pin down, and the uncertainty… just keeps moving.
‘Quintessentially Italian’ lands at CVG with a new terminal spot
Israeli Navy targets Hezbollah, Hamas, and Iran in multi-front ops