USA 24

TSA officers find smoke grenades hidden in peanut butter

TSA officers at Indianapolis International Airport discovered two live smoke grenades in a passenger’s checked luggage after one was concealed inside a jar of peanut butter. The incident triggered additional screening, involved airport police, and led TSA offi

A jar of peanut butter may sound like a harmless carry-on habit—but at Indianapolis International Airport, it became the container for something far more dangerous.

TSA officers inspecting a passenger’s checked luggage flagged the bag for an additional screening earlier this month after the X-ray scanner signaled a concern. Supervisory TSA officer Anthony Vela and explosives specialist Michael Dunphy examined the contents and found two live smoke grenades. with one described in a June 25 TSA news release as “jammed into a full jar of peanut butter.”.

Dunphy said he expected the inspection to end once all items were removed. “After all contents were removed from the bag. I thought. ‘Weren’t there two grenades in this bag?’” he said in the release. After further checking, he said it became clear the second grenade was in the peanut butter jar. “After additional inspection of all the contents in the bag. it became obvious the second grenade was in the peanut butter jar. so I was surprised!”.

The TSA said alarms on checked-baggage technology can be triggered by “unusual items versus an actual threat.” Dunphy said that distinction mattered even as officers moved quickly to verify what they were seeing.

After the discovery, officials called the traveler to the airline ticket counter. The release states the passenger told authorities that “a friend told him he could get the smoke grenades through TSA by placing them in a jar of peanut butter.”

image

TSA Federal Security Director Aaron Batt said the concealment method itself raised alarms. “With the concealment method used. we had concern about the intentions and. as a result. quickly incorporated the airport police and airline station manager to ensure we approached the traveler in a cautious and safe manner. ” Batt said in the release. He added that the checked baggage technology “performed well” and gave officers a chance to review an image before they needed a physical inspection of the area highlighted by the equipment.

Indiana Airport Authority Police were also called to the scene. Despite the response, the release said airport operations were unaffected by the incident.

TSA did not disclose the passenger’s identity or whether he will face charges. Batt warned that trying to conceal a prohibited item carries serious risk. “Attempting to conceal a prohibited item will result in ‘severe consequences,’” he said in the release.

He also addressed the possibility of unintended harm. “Although you may not have intentions for something to occur. carrying prohibited items always has the potential for unintentionally causing harm. ” Batt said. “Imagine in this case had the pressurization caused the device to accidentally release smoke filling the cabin and aircraft while in flight.”.

The case underscores how quickly an ordinary-looking item can become part of an airport security threat—and how aggressively the system can pivot once live explosives are found.

TSA Indianapolis International Airport smoke grenade peanut butter jar checked baggage airport security explosives specialist federal security director

4 Comments

  1. So TSA saw “smoke grenades” because of a peanut butter jar in checked luggage? I feel like nobody reads the whole thing, but also how did a friend even think that would work??

  2. I’m not saying it’s fake but it’s always “jar of peanut butter” with TSA. Next they’ll find a rocket in mac and cheese. Also how do grenades even fit in peanut butter… don’t grenades explode? Seems kinda sus.

  3. If a friend told him he could get it through by putting smoke grenades in peanut butter, that’s honestly the most scary part. Like what other “life hacks” are people believing. I guess the X-ray just flagged it, but it’s checked baggage so I’m like… how was it not caught earlier? Also “unusual items versus actual threat” sounds like a lot of fluff to me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? Please solve:Captcha


Secret Link