USA 24

Trump cancels Clayton hearing, blindsides Senate fast-track

Trump cancels – President Donald Trump’s early-morning social media post just before 4 a.m. on June 17 derailed a Senate fast-track plan for Jay Clayton’s director of national intelligence confirmation hearing. Republicans scrambling to keep Bill Pulte from taking over as act

Hours after a Senate confirmation hearing was scheduled for June 17—a hearing that could have sent Jay Clayton toward a full vote by June 18—Trump posted an interruption so sudden his own allies were caught off guard.

Trump’s grousing unfolded in an early morning social media message just before 4 a.m. on June 17, after Senate Republicans had been ready to fast-track Clayton’s nomination. The timeline had been designed around speed: a confirmation hearing set for June 17 created the possibility of a full Senate vote on June 18. with Clayton potentially taking the job by the end of the week.

Then Trump disrupted the process before his Republican colleagues even had the chance to prepare. In the post, he announced he was “cancelling” the Senate hearing for Clayton.

At the center of the fight is Bill Pulte. The president named Pulte—currently the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s director—as the new acting director of national intelligence. That acting role is set to begin on June 19. Pulte is also described as a federal housing official and an enthusiastic participant in Trump’s retribution efforts against perceived enemies.

To Trump, the opposition to Pulte was the starting point. In his post, Trump complained that Republicans and Democrats had opposed Pulte, calling him “very fair, and talented.” Yet the president did not even attempt to nominate Pulte as permanent director of national intelligence.

Clayton, too, is part of the same pressure point. The president had nominated Clayton just last week after opposition to Pulte forced a recalculation. Clayton is currently the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. and like Pulte. he also lacks the legally required intelligence experience for the job as DNI.

Senate Republicans were not just responding to Trump’s repeated complaints in his second term about nominations that can take too long. This time, they were trying to keep a specific outcome from happening on a specific date—head off Pulte’s move into the acting DNI role on June 19.

That timing matters because it lands on the edge of the political calendar. With November’s midterm elections looming, Senate Republicans are said to fear losing the chamber to Democrats. That pressure. the reporting says. helps explain why Republicans have been steering some of Trump’s proposals toward parliamentary dead ends.

Those dead ends include previous efforts to reshape the president’s agenda in ways that Senate Republicans ultimately blocked. In May. Trump demanded $1 billion for “security” for a ballroom he wants to build on the site where he demolished the White House’s East Wing. Republicans gave the proposal a go. recognized it was doomed. and stripped the $1 billion request from legislation intended to fund immigration and border security.

image

Trump also faced another Senate roadblock when he proposed a $1.8 billion slush fund to pay supporters who said they had been abused by being held accountable under the law. That too could not pass in the Senate. Trump has said it might not be all the way dead, but the immediate path forward was blocked.

In the latest disruption. the reporting frames Trump’s outburst as an escalation of his attempt to tie up legislation that might not have enough votes on its own. The renewal of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act’s Section 702—allowing for spying on communications by foreigners—is described as something Trump is trying to push through alongside renewal efforts tied to a different measure that does not have the votes: the SAVE America Act. which would federalize elections to make it harder for Americans to vote.

Trump’s post portrayed this as a kind of political maneuver, writing that his demand—rejected by Senate Republicans—would “add a slight bit of intrigue” to the process.

U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, responded with a plan designed to continue the hearing unless Clayton was a no-show. Clayton then stood up to the committee, following Trump’s orders—an outcome Cotton later called “regrettable.”

U.S. Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia. the ranking Democrat on the committee. pushed back on the premise that Republicans had to manage the moment to accommodate the president’s temper. Warner declared that what he was seeing amounted to “an extraordinary display of dysfunction. ” with a president who seems determined to turn America’s national security into a political bargaining chip. He added: “At every turn. the president has injected more uncertainty into a process that should be focused on one thing: keeping the American people safe.”.

U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, described the broader situation with blunt skepticism, calling the move “another kink in the slinky that makes no sense.”

Through the sequence, the stakes have stayed clear even as the politics roils. Republicans have been trying to manage the president’s disruptions while also trying to avoid outcomes—like Pulte’s acting role beginning on June 19—that could reshape the agency leadership right before the political season heats up.

Donald Trump Jay Clayton Bill Pulte director of national intelligence Senate Intelligence Committee Tom Cotton Mark Warner Thom Tillis Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Section 702 SAVE America Act U.S. Senate confirmation national security election federalization Trump nominations

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? Please solve:Captcha