Patriots pay steep price for A.J. Brown

Patriots pay – The New England Patriots landed three-time Pro Bowler A.J. Brown by sending a 2028 first-round pick and a 2027 fifth-rounder to Philadelphia, a trade that multiple analysts graded as costly—yet still unevenly beneficial to both teams. The debate centers on Bro
The Patriots got the receiver they wanted—then immediately paid for it.
New England acquired A.J. Brown from Philadelphia in a trade that sends a 2028 first-round pick and a 2027 fifth-round pick to complete the swap. For an organization that has spent this era trying to build around Drake Maye. the addition comes with a clear message: New England believes its window for contention is now. and it is willing to mortgage draft capital to make the offense sharper.
Brown. a three-time Pro Bowler. arrives as a proven. explosive target after years spent doing exactly what young quarterbacks need most. But the price tag—especially the 2028 first-rounder—also immediately triggered a familiar argument among evaluators: did the Patriots give up too much for a wide receiver who will be 29 by the end of the month?.
Jeff Howe of The Athletic handed the trade a Grade of B for the Patriots, calling it a premium. Howe pointed directly to Brown’s age and the risk that comes with durability. noting concerns built from “a drop in both production and availability over the last two seasons.” He also referenced a similar “valley” in Brown’s final two seasons with the Tennessee Titans before the trade to Philadelphia. when Brown produced two of the best seasons of his career.
Howe didn’t rule out a rebound with the Patriots. He highlighted that Brown could be reinvigorated by a new chapter and a different system under Mike Vrabel. writing that Brown is “intrinsically wired to find all sorts of ways for self-motivation. ” and suggesting “a big season in 2026 almost feels inevitable. health permitting.”.
Even with those concerns, Howe also graded Philadelphia positively. He awarded the Eagles a B+ for securing a solid return for a player who “wore out his welcome” in Philadelphia. Howe emphasized that the Eagles wouldn’t have found “auction-style compensation” because there wasn’t a lot of interest across the NFL. He wrote that the Eagles’ early price included a 2026 first-round pick. and when that combined with “concern about Brown’s long-term durability. ” the market didn’t produce many suitors willing to meet the asking price.
On the other end of the spectrum. Gary Davenport of Bleacher Report gave New England an A- for making the aggressive move. Davenport argued there was “no way the Pats were getting Brown for less than a first. ” and said the team succeeded in pushing that first-round pick out to 2028. He described the fifth-rounder as essentially a throw-in and called the overall cost “a reasonable cost for a No. 1 wide receiver.”.
Davenport’s optimism also came with a picture of what the offense could look like right away. He said New England will “roll out Brown and youngster Kayshon Boutte” on the perimeter with “free agent Romeo Doubs” handling the slot. He added that the Patriots also have veteran tight end Hunter Henry. plus a “two-headed backfield” featuring Rhamondre Stevenson and TreVeyon Henderson.
In Davenport’s view, this wasn’t simply a single-player upgrade. It was a clear attempt to surround Drake Maye with enough weapons that his passing options don’t get squeezed when the playoffs arrive.
For the Eagles, Davenport’s grade was a B-. He said the downside for Philadelphia was obvious: waiting until 2028 to receive a first-round pick “isn’t ideal. ” especially with a wide receiver corps that now has a hole even with rookie Makai Lemon in town. He also noted that Philadelphia’s top two wideouts—Lemon and DeVonta Smith—are both undersized.
Still, Davenport said Philadelphia improved its situation by eliminating locker-room uncertainty and adding a first-round pick. He wrote that it’s “not [Eagles GM] Howie Roseman’s best work,” but also “not his worst either.”
ESPN’s Seth Walder split the difference with a B- grade for the Patriots. acknowledging that Brown’s down season in 2025 may have been tied to broader issues in Philadelphia—specifically Jalen Hurts and the Eagles’ struggles—rather than a collapse in Brown’s skill. Even so, Walder questioned whether New England is now close enough to be considered a real championship favorite.
Walder wrote that the Patriots “should be aiming for a return to the Super Bowl. ” but that the Brown deal shouldn’t be seen as “a title favorite adding the final piece to put it over the top.” He pointed to a projection from ESPN’s Football Power Index. saying New England would be the “12th-best team in the league entering 2026.” In Walder’s telling. the Patriots can get back to the Super Bowl again. but they are “farther away than the average defending conference champion.”.
Walder graded Philadelphia an A- for Roseman. He described the result as a solid business move because “the team and player had pretty clearly reached the end of their time together.” Walder also said the Eagles are “worse at receiver without Brown than they were with him. ” while adding that Philadelphia had planned for it: drafting Makai Lemon in the first round of this year’s draft and trading for Dontayvion Wicks. With DeVonta Smith stepping into the clear WR1 role, Walder said Philadelphia remains okay.
CBS Sports’ Bryan DeArdo landed on a B+ for New England. He focused less on risk and more on necessity. arguing New England “needed an upgrade at receiver” and that it got one in Brown. a “three-time Pro Bowler” still in his prime. DeArdo also traced Brown’s impact across teams. In Tennessee, he wrote, Brown helped the Titans win two division titles and temporarily elevated quarterback Ryan Tannehill. In Philadelphia, DeArdo said Brown built a rapport with Jalen Hurts, culminating in Hurts earning Super Bowl MVP honors.
For DeArdo, the practical reason mattered most: the Patriots are banking on Brown making a similar impact on Drake Maye, who “solidified his standing last season as New England’s franchise quarterback.”
But DeArdo’s critique turned sharper on the Eagles. He gave Philadelphia a C- and said Roseman’s inability to get a 2027 first-round pick for Brown was baffling. DeArdo wrote that criticizing Roseman for a trade he just made is like criticizing Steven Spielberg before opening night. Even with that caveat. he argued that Brown’s age and value over time should have enabled a better return than what Philadelphia got.
To make the comparison. DeArdo reached back to a precedent from 2022: the Packers received future first- and second-round picks from the Raiders in exchange for Davante Adams. DeArdo wrote that Adams was a better player than Brown is now. but said that didn’t explain the compensation gap. He acknowledged that Brown’s demeanor at the end of his time in Nashville and Philadelphia “likely hurt like trade value. ” but concluded that the Eagles should not have been unable to secure anything better than “a fifth-round pick next year and a first-round pick in 2028.”.
USA Today’s Jack McKessy gave the Patriots a B+ and the Eagles a B. describing the deal as one that benefited both sides. McKessy wrote that New England needed a No. 1 receiver and Brown was among the best they could acquire. He said landing Brown “certainly” wasn’t cheap due to Brown being “soon-to-be 29-year-old. ” but argued that the Patriots keeping their first-round pick in what is expected to be a strong 2027 NFL Draft class was a win for the organization.
McKessy also emphasized familiarity with Mike Vrabel. writing that Brown’s connection to him made the deal easier to like from New England’s standpoint. For the Eagles. McKessy said they did well to replenish depth at the position after Brown times grew disgruntled in Philadelphia last season. He added that the Eagles were equipped for “life without the veteran wide-out.”.
Taken together, the grades tell the same story with different conclusions. The Patriots clearly bought immediate offensive impact with a costly draft outlay—a 2028 first-round pick and a 2027 fifth-rounder. The Eagles. meanwhile. shed a situation that multiple evaluators said had reached its limit. even if the haul came with trade-market uncertainty and questions about whether Philadelphia gave up too much or simply avoided a worse outcome.
Now the on-field test is simple: whether Brown can deliver another peak-like stretch for a New England offense built around Drake Maye—and whether turning the next first-round pick into 2028 draft flexibility is worth it if the contention window is truly in motion.
A.J. Brown New England Patriots trade grades Mike Vrabel Drake Maye Philadelphia Eagles Howie Roseman 2028 first-round pick 2027 fifth-rounder Makai Lemon DeVonta Smith
So they traded a 2028 first… for a receiver?? Bold choice.
I don’t even know why they’re doing this now, like didn’t they just draft Drake Maye to build slow? But also A.J. Brown is a beast so yeah idk. Sounds like they’re buying wins though.
Wait, is the 2028 first-round pick the one they gave up that turns into like a top 10 guy? Cuz if he’s 29 already then that’s kinda wild. I swear I saw another headline that said they got Brown for a second? so now I’m confused.
They mortgage the future every time and then act surprised when it hurts later. Like what if Maye doesn’t even need him yet? Plus I keep thinking Philadelphia “won” the trade just because they always seem smarter with draft stuff. But hey, Brown could change everything, so I guess we’ll see.