As the Iran war enters day 60, President Trump is set for talks with top security advisers. The US signals possible support for easing economic pressure while broader negotiations remain stuck.
The Iran war has now stretched into its 60th day, with negotiations still stuck even as diplomacy tries to regain momentum.
US President Donald Trump is reportedly preparing to meet with his top security advisers on Monday, as negotiations with Tehran remain deadlocked.. The focus, according to reporting, is expected to include how Washington should respond while talks continue to test the limits of what both sides are willing to concede.
A key strand in the discussions appears to be economic pressure.. Former US official Henry S.. Ensher suggested Trump may be inclined to back an Iranian proposal aimed at easing that pressure.. The logic is familiar: when sanctions bite hard, governments tend to look for a near-term off-ramp rather than trying to solve every issue at once.
Diplomacy, however, is not a single-track process.. Ensher said reopening the Strait of Hormuz is likely to sit high on the agenda, while the nuclear question could prove far more difficult to untangle.. That distinction matters because it points to a possible strategy—treating the trade and security corridor as urgent, while nuclear negotiations proceed more slowly, in parallel or through a separate track.
Strategists also framed the potential move as a calculated risk.. Separating nuclear talks from efforts to reopen a vital shipping route could, in theory, reduce immediate strain on the global economy.. But it could also widen the gap between what each side demands and what they are able to deliver in the short term.
On the political side, the reported role of US Vice President JD Vance has drawn attention.. Analysts say Vance could gain influence if he helps secure a path toward ending the conflict or facilitating a US exit.. Republican strategist John Feehery suggested that negotiators Jared Kushner and Witkoff are exceptionally close to Israel, while Vance’s reported appeal to Iran could give him an additional diplomatic lever.
For readers watching the conflict from the outside, the most immediate question is what “progress” would actually look like on the ground.. Reopening the Strait of Hormuz is not a symbolic step.. It is a commercial artery for the region, and any movement there tends to be felt quickly—through shipping schedules, insurance costs, and energy pricing.
At the same time, the deeper issue remains: whether talks can survive the political pressure created by ongoing conflict.. When negotiations drag, domestic incentives often push leaders toward tougher public stances, even if private discussions continue.. That tension can make breakthroughs less frequent and more fragile.
As the war reaches day 60, Misryoum expects the next phase of diplomacy to revolve around sequencing—what gets addressed first, what gets postponed, and how officials manage the optics of concessions.. If Washington leans toward supporting an easing of economic pressure while keeping a separate, longer horizon for nuclear talks, the outcome could be a narrower, more achievable deal.. But if nuclear demands and security guarantees are forced into the same timeline, negotiations may remain deadlocked.
In the days ahead, Trump’s meeting with top security advisers could offer the clearest signal yet about which direction US policy is leaning—toward narrowing the conflict through practical steps like the Strait of Hormuz, or toward demanding broader breakthroughs before any meaningful relief is granted.