With Artemis II back on Earth, what’s next for NASA?
After a nerve-wracking six-minute communications blackout, the Artemis II Orion spacecraft came back to Earth safely in the Pacific Ocean on Friday—an escape that looked like science fiction for a moment and then, just like that, became another briefing room headline.
The four-person crew—Commander Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, and mission specialists Christina Koch and Jeremy Hansen—spent 10 days in space, launching into a world where NASA’s last human moonflight dated to 1972. In between, there’s been lots of progress, sure, but also a long gap in “how it actually feels” to be inside the systems that will carry people back to the lunar surface. During the blackout, Orion plunged through Earth’s atmosphere at more than 25,000 miles per hour, reaching temperatures of over 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit—so hot the whole thing was basically a heat-baking test of whether the vehicle’s design and procedures still hold up.
NASA’s two big goals were straightforward: make sure Orion could operate safely in deep space, and use the lunar flyby to learn as much as possible about the moon. Misryoum newsroom reported that the mission was record-breaking and, for the most part, an almost complete success. The crew set a record for the farthest distance traveled from Earth—252,756 miles—and got views of lunar regions no human eyes have seen directly. And even off the technical scoreboard, Artemis II seemed to pull a lot of people back toward space exploration, more than half a century after Apollo ended.
You could feel that momentum hanging in the air after splashdown. One public comment session later, there was a similar note running through the crew’s messages: the science mattered, but the human experience stood out just as much—or maybe more. Hansen, an astronaut with the Canadian Space Agency, said, “You haven’t heard us talk a lot about the science,” adding that it’s “the human experience that is extraordinary for us.” In a different moment, Koch joked about being “the space plumber” as the spacecraft wrestled with its lavatory issue. Even when the mission hit technical bumps, the crew’s energy stayed oddly grounded.
What happens next is where the real pressure kicks in. Artemis III is already underway in planning terms, aiming—at least in NASA’s outline—for testing, in low-Earth orbit, the docking process between Orion and a lunar landing spacecraft designed by private companies. NASA officials said the first flight simulations for Artemis III will be scripted this week, with training for mission control staff beginning next week. The crew, NASA astronaut Randy Bresnik told reporters on Friday, will be selected “pretty soon.”
Misryoum editorial desk noted that the private-sector pieces are moving too: NASA has contracted with SpaceX and Blue Origin to build the landing spacecraft. Blue Origin’s “Blue Moon” lander is being shipped to Kennedy Space Center soon, according to Amit Kshatriya, NASA’s associate administrator. More tests of the SpaceX Starship lander are scheduled for this month, though Kshatriya said NASA is hoping to send that ship to Florida “relatively soon.” Repair and repurposing of the Mobile Launcher 1—a 380-foot tower used to stack the Artemis I through III rockets—could be completed as soon as the end of this week.
Then there’s the bigger dream: a moon base in the 2030s. NASA is talking about it in the context of a wider, competitive push—often described as a new space race with China—but experts say it will take more than rockets that work. The timeline depends on Artemis III and Artemis IV going smoothly, and on the possibility of a human walk on the moon in 2028 for the first time since Eugene Cernan stepped off the lunar surface during Apollo 17 in December 1972. The risks are real, but Misryoum analysis indicates the recent safety record is encouraging.
What could still derail everything, experts warn, is the same thing that has a way of showing up in big government projects: funding and commitment. During Apollo, NASA accounted for 4.4% of the federal budget at its peak; now it’s around 0.4%. Joan Johnson-Freese, a senior fellow at Women in International Security and author of “Space as a Strategic Asset,” said she’s seen more optimism this past week than she has in 40 years—but she remains skeptical, pointing to past cancellations when budgets and public attention faded.
The mission may have reawakened public “joy and thrill,” Johnson-Freese said, but the thrill only takes you so far—especially when the next step requires sustained support long after the cameras move on. And with Artemis II successfully back on Earth, NASA now has to turn that brief surge into something sturdier. Whether it can, we’ll find out—one checklist, one test, one budget fight at a time.
Trump dodges gas-price question as Strait of Hormuz blockade plan looms