The speaker of the Iranian parliament, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, said the Israeli attack highlighted America’s inability to restrain Israel. “The Zionists’ incursion into Dahiyeh has once again shown that America either lacks the will to fulfill its commitments or the ability to do so. By giving the green light to the regime, you cannot gain concessions. The game of bad cop and good cop is outdated,” he said. The head of the Iranian parliament’s national security committee, Ebrahim Azizi, said that a “strong response is
coming” to Israel in the wake of the attack on Beirut. The reactions highlighted the divisions within Iran, however, as Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said the country’s peak negotiating body supported the “path of negotiation” with the US. “The Supreme National Security Council has concluded that the path of negotiation must be pursued,” Pezeshkian said at a meeting with media officials, according to Agence France-Presse.
Beirut, Dahiyeh, Israel strikes, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Ebrahim Azizi, Masoud Pezeshkian, Supreme National Security Council, US-Iran negotiations, Trump restraint
Trump says restraint but nobody else listens anyway. so like whats the point.
I don’t get how Iran is blaming America for Israel striking Beirut like… Iran knows Israel’s gonna do Israel stuff right? Also “bad cop good cop” sounds like some political word salad.
Wait, is this saying Trump is gonna restrain Israel or that Trump is restraining Iran? The article title says one thing then I’m reading Iran people saying green light and negotiations. Feels like everyone’s just talking past each other.
“Strong response is coming” is such a scary phrase. And then the president is talking about negotiation with the US like it’s a normal meeting? Idk, this makes it sound like Iran has factions, but then I keep seeing the word “Trump restraint” like he’s the one controlling it all. probably just politics as usual.