USA Today

Trump Pushes Broad NDAs for Federal Employees

Trump broad – The Trump administration is seeking new, broad non-disclosure agreements for federal employees—an effort aimed at curbing disclosures and tightening control over non-public information. The proposal is still in draft form and will go through a 30-day public co

Federal employees could soon be asked to sign a wider-reaching non-disclosure agreement meant to shut down a familiar headache for this administration: leaks.

The proposal. still in draft form. would require federal workers to acknowledge and agree to comply with existing legal duties to protect non-public. confidential. or proprietary information. On its face, it doesn’t appear to create a whole new category of restrictions. But in the day-to-day reality of government. the change is being pursued for one clear reason—giving the administration another lever to discourage disclosures that officials and the White House have repeatedly blamed on leakers and media organizations.

President Donald Trump and members of his administration have, in recent months, attacked disclosures tied to topics ranging from the status of the US-Iran war to FBI Director Kash Patel’s alleged drinking habits.

The draft NDA is connected to a broader push to make secrecy easier to enforce. The Office of Personnel Management says the agreement would “document Federal employees’ acknowledgment of. and agreement to comply with. current legal obligations to safeguard non-public. confidential. or proprietary information.”.

For now, the plan is not yet binding. It will need to clear a 30-day public comment period before it can be implemented, and each agency would then decide whether to use the NDA.

The stakes are more than procedural. The public has often learned about the government’s plans and inner workings through exactly the kind of information this NDA is designed to crack down on—both historically and during the current Trump administration. If implemented, the move would add another step toward less transparency.

And it fits into a larger picture of a second term that has been defined by personalization of government. from former personal lawyers taking senior roles at the Justice Department to a UFC fight on the White House lawn to mark his birthday. Critics and observers have pointed to how Trump’s gilded taste has also seemed to spill beyond the symbolic and into the day-to-day culture of power.

Potential NDAs—described here as a “fond private-sector tactic” calibrated for employees Trump sees as serving him. rather than the American people—would extend that impulse into the federal workforce. The administration’s goal is not subtle: deter disclosures before they happen. and narrow the routes through which information reaches the public.

For federal employees. the decision may come down to whether their agencies choose to adopt the agreement after the public comment period ends. For the rest of the country. the question will be whether the new NDA becomes another tool for tightening the flow of information—or a step that changes what can be said. and by whom. inside the federal government.

Trump administration non-disclosure agreement federal employees leaks transparency Office of Personnel Management public comment period US-Iran war Kash Patel

4 Comments

  1. This sounds like the administration is trying to stop people from talking, but they’re calling it “legal duties” like that makes it not sketchy. If it’s not binding yet, why are we already acting like it is? Also, the media will definitely get blamed either way.

  2. Wait so if you’re a federal employee you already have to protect stuff, right? So what’s the big deal, unless they’re changing what counts as “proprietary” or “non-public.” I saw something about Kash Patel and drinking habits so I’m guessing this is just to silence gossip? Like leaks are gonna happen no matter what, people talk.

  3. NDAs for the feds feels like more control over everything. Like first they come for the leakers, then they come for anybody who even says “what’s going on.” And it says it’s about curbing disclosures but that’s literally government transparency lol. I don’t trust Office of Personnel Management wording, they always make it sound harmless.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? Please solve:Captcha


Secret Link