OPINION: The real college crisis isn’t enrollment. It’s completion, and it’s time to start asking why

college completion – More than 43 million Americans have started college and left without a degree, and the writer argues the nation has treated “not finishing” as normal rather than as a moral and economic emergency. Using completion data and an example from Georgia State, the pi
Imagine a student who begins college courses while still in high school through a dual-enrollment program. By the time they arrive on campus as a first-year student, they already have credits completed.
They are the first in their family to attend a four-year institution. Focused. Capable. Working part-time to help support things at home. They make it through their first year. Then their second.
Somewhere along the way, things shift. An unexpected expense. A change in work hours. A delay in financial aid. Nothing dramatic on its own, but enough. They stop out. They plan to come back the next semester.
But then, they don’t.
If you sit in on any enrollment meeting at a college today, you’ll hear the same concerns: fewer students in the pipeline, more competition, the looming demographic cliff. Institutions are scrambling to bring more students in. But the writer argues that’s not the most urgent part of the story.
The more pressing failure is what happens after students enroll.
More than 43 million Americans have started college and left without a degree. They enrolled. They showed up. And somewhere along the way, they slipped through.
National completion rates have improved over time, with six-year completion rates now exceeding 60 percent. Yet nearly four out of every ten students who begin college do not complete a degree within six years. In most sectors. a success rate of just over 60 percent would not be considered acceptable; it would be viewed as a warning sign.
Still, higher education has grown accustomed to the idea that a large share of students simply won’t finish. The piece calls that normalization a structural feature of American higher education—and says it amounts to a moral and economic catastrophe.
The 43 million Americans with some college and no credential, the writer says, are not failures. They are living evidence of an infrastructure never designed to see them through. They enrolled during a moment of hope and left during a moment of hardship. Their outcomes reflect systems built for a traditional student population that no longer matches the majority of today’s learners.
Higher education systems were largely designed around the full-time, residential 18-year-old entering directly from high school with family financial support. Today’s students, however, increasingly balance work, family responsibilities, financial pressures and other obligations alongside their education. Flexibility, rather than conformity to a traditional model, is essential.
The piece also highlights completion gaps by race and ethnicity: Black and Hispanic students continue to complete bachelor’s degrees at lower rates than their white and Asian peers. These disparities. the writer says. are often linked to differences in financial resources. educational opportunities and the ways students experience institutional environments and support systems. They are not marginal differences—described here as a nearly 30-point completion gap between groups promised access to the same credential and the economic mobility it is supposed to provide.
For students who stop out without a credential. the writer argues. the consequences can be worse than if they had never enrolled at all. They often carry debt without realizing the earnings benefits associated with degree completion. and they are significantly more likely to default on student loans.
They enroll for the promise of a better life, and too often emerge with a financial burden and no credential to show for it.
The argument turns from statistics to what change could look like, pointing to a case that tries to act before students vanish from the system.
In 2012. Georgia State launched GPS Advising. a predictive analytics platform that updates student records nightly and continuously analyzes more than 800 academic and financial risk indicators for each student. Advisers receive real-time alerts and intervene within days. not semesters. giving them a chance to provide help before students stop out. Georgia State also created Panther Retention Grants. proactively identifying students facing modest financial barriers and reaching out with targeted emergency assistance before those students stop out.
The piece describes what happened next as evidence that institutions can redesign around completion rather than sorting.
Georgia State increased the number of bachelor’s degrees awarded annually by approximately 28 percent between 2010 and 2021. Bachelor’s degrees awarded to Black students increased by 57 percent. while bachelor’s degrees awarded to Hispanic students increased by more than 120 percent. And for several consecutive years, Black, Hispanic, first-generation and low-income students graduated at rates at or above the university average.
The writer stresses that Georgia State did not do this by recruiting different students. The approach, as presented here, was building systems that met the students it already had. “The students were always capable. The infrastructure was not,” the piece argues.
Proactive advising, emergency financial aid that moves fast, and data systems that surface who is struggling before they are already gone, the writer says, made a huge difference.
That example becomes a prescription: colleges need to develop programs that reflect how students live and work. and they must hold institutions accountable for whether students finish. not just whether they enroll. The piece also calls for reconnection with students who left but are close to finishing—often only a course or two away.
The enrollment crisis is real. But the completion crisis, the writer argues, is larger, older, quieter and more devastating. After spending a decade debating the front door of American higher education. the piece says it’s time to look at the millions of students who have already walked out. receipts in hand. without the credential they came for.
They needed institutions to meet them where they were. In too many cases, the writer says, they didn’t.
Emmanuel Lalande is senior vice president of enrollment strategy and student success at Columbia College Chicago, a private, nonprofit school for creatives that offers a curriculum that blends creative and media arts, liberal arts, and business.
This story about college completion was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. It is republished here under a Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
college completion higher education student success enrollment vs completion predictive analytics advising Georgia State GPS Advising Panther Retention Grants financial aid delays stop out racial completion gaps
So it’s not enrollment, it’s “completion”… okay but who’s paying for all that?
I feel like they just want to blame students like it’s our fault we can’t finish. Like yeah sometimes aid delays happen but also maybe people shouldn’t rack up classes while working and in HS too? Not sure.
Georgia State example sounds familiar, but I thought colleges just automatically lock you in and you finish no matter what. If students stop out because of financial aid timing, that seems like the system should’ve caught it earlier.
This is so frustrating because everyone keeps talking about enrollment numbers like that’s the problem, but completion is the real mess. My cousin did dual enrollment and still couldn’t finish, and it was like one paper got messed up and suddenly it’s a whole year gone. Also they act like it’s “economic” but it’s moral too, like duh. I don’t know, colleges just keep raising costs so of course people fall off.