Trending now

NYC gets class-size deadline extension—saving $500M

NYC class-size – New York City stands to save $500 million after state lawmakers postponed the deadline for public schools to meet class-size limits, but education leaders and budget analysts are now pressing for equity—especially as incentives and exemptions could shift costs

On Monday. the numbers landed hard: New York City expects to save $500 million by extending the deadline for public schools to meet class-size limits. The savings come from postponing a requirement that would have forced major hiring and. in some cases. new classroom space to ensure no class exceeded 25 students by next fall.

But by the time City Council Education leaders finished questioning the Department of Education, the real question wasn’t whether the city could delay the bill. It was what that delay could quietly change—who gets smaller classes sooner, and who pays the cost.

City Council Member Eric Dinowitz, a Bronx Democrat who chairs the Committee on Education, acknowledged the savings during an executive budget hearing Monday. Still, he warned DOE officials that compliance can’t be treated like an accounting exercise.

“DOE must get to 100% class size compliance in a way that is equitable,” Dinowitz said. “We cannot prioritize schools that need help reaching compliance at the expense of schools that meet the class size mandate, but have other needs.”

The class-size rule traces back to a 2022 state law. Under that law, NYC public schools would have had to increase the number of teachers—and in some cases find additional space—so that no class in NYC Department of Education schools would exceed 25 students by next fall.

Carrying it out would have demanded a “massive public investment. ” and with the city facing a major budgetary shortfall. state lawmakers introduced legislation to extend the deadline by two years. That extension is the reason the city is now looking at avoiding immediate millions in staffing and school construction costs tied to meeting the mandate on the original timetable.

NYC Schools Commissioner Kamar Samuels told the city’s budget hearing that the DOE will release a class-size mandate plan sometime next week. He said the extended timeline will let the department execute capital and hiring strategies sustainably.

“The extension of the implementation timeline will allow us to execute our capital and hiring strategies sustainably and with fidelity. building on the progress we have made since my last testimony. ” Samuels said. “Specifically. we’ve worked shoulder to shoulder with SCA [School Construction Authority] to create a multi-year plan for all schools with class-size related space needs.”.

Samuels said the DOE has already allocated funding to schools that need additional hiring and more space to reach the benchmark. The concern now: the schools currently lagging on class-size compliance are often in districts with lower economic need and higher academic achievement.

Students in districts with lower economic need have been shown to perform. on average. better academically than students in districts with greater economic need. And a report by the policy research nonprofit Urban Institute says that. in order to satisfy class mandate requirements. additional resources are being funneled to schools that generally outperform schools with less economic need that happen to meet class size benchmarks.

The extension also includes a labor-related incentive tied to exemptions. Under an agreement with the United Federation of Teachers (UFT). teachers in schools with certain exemptions to the class-size benchmarks would be eligible for a pay differential of up to $8. 500 a year if their classes exceed the cap.

UFT President Michael Mulgrew said when the extension bill was introduced that the union had hoped the differential would push DOE to do the hiring and expansion needed for NYC students. Mulgrew also said earlier this month that the union did not want an extension at all.

“We did not want an extension; we want compliance,” Mulgrew said earlier this month. “But the reality is that New York City. up until now. had not done all that was needed to make this law a reality in every classroom. If giving this new administration two more years gets us a partner committed to building the necessary seats. then it is the fastest way to turn the law into reality.”.

Still, the city’s budget office raised a different kind of warning—one about money flowing to incentives instead of classrooms.

The Independent Budget Office (IBO) said such incentives could cost the city $21 million next year and potentially increase in 2028. The IBO identified classes that qualified for exemptions this year and estimated that more than 2. 300 teachers would be eligible for the pay differential next year. If each teacher received the full $8,500, the IBO said it would cost the city tens of millions of dollars.

Louisa Chafee, director of the IBO, testified at a budget hearing in May. Chafee said the “bonus program helps teachers in crowded classrooms but does not address the presumed benefits that lower class sizes were envisioned to have for children’s education.”

While the state extension is now set: the extension passed both the State Assembly and the State Senate and awaits Gov. Kathy Hochul’s signature. The IBO also laid out what would have happened without the extension—stating that the city would have been forced to hire 3. 000 new teachers over the summer. a significant expense and logistical hurdle.

The deadline is moving. The promise is still the same—class-size compliance. The dispute now is about the path to get there: whether delaying the clock preserves children’s chances at smaller classrooms, or whether it shifts resources in a way that leaves some students waiting longer than others.

NYC class-size mandate DOE Eric Dinowitz Kamar Samuels UFT Michael Mulgrew School Construction Authority Independent Budget Office Urban Institute Kathy Hochul 25 students per class $500 million savings $8 500 pay differential

4 Comments

  1. They delayed it like that magically helps everyone? I don’t get how postponing smaller classes is “equity.” Sounds like the rich schools get the good stuff first again.

  2. Eric Dinowitz said equitable but this is NYC… so it’s just accounting games. Also class size limits at 25? I swear I heard this was already supposed to be fixed years ago.

  3. Wait, so they’re saving $500 million by pushing hiring and classrooms out, but then education leaders are worried about who pays the cost?? Like… that cost is still there, it’s just later. Exemptions/incentives always means certain schools get a pass and others don’t, and parents will find out last. Not surprised it’s Bronx vs everyone else or whatever.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? Please solve:Captcha


Secret Link