The death toll from the catastrophic floods that swept through parts of Nepal and Tibet last week has risen beyond 1,000 people, while thousands of people remain missing. Among them are hundreds of workers believed to be stuck inside large underground tunnels connected to hydroelectric power plants. As the rescue mission continues, researchers warn that disasters like this could become more common all over the planet as a result of climate change.
Part of what made this disaster so deadly was its suddenness. Experts believe it was likely caused by a large landslide on the mountain Langtang Lirung that included a chunk of glacier. It sent hundreds of millions of tons of ice, rock and other debris hurtling down the slopes to the villages below. The avalanche traveled nearly 100 kilometers (about 62 miles), according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
And while it’s too early to say whether this event was caused by rising global temperatures, the trend is clear: Earth is getting warmer, and that will make disasters like this worse and more common. The rest of the world should be on notice.
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Understanding why climate change is making such events more likely is important. Generally, in high-altitude environments such as mountain ranges, permafrost—basically, frozen soil—holds sediment and rocky material together. When it thaws, it can cause cracks in the rocks that make a violent break more likely.
“It’s essentially preconditioning the glacier and the rock for potential collapse or a landslide,” says Regine Hock, a geoscientist at the University of Oslo.
At the same time, the world’s glaciers are shrinking because of the warming planet. This weakens the ice’s “buttressing” effect on the surrounding slopes, which in turn make those rocks more unstable, Hock says. Excess melted water can also create lubrication, more easily triggering a slip, she says.
What that means is that, in principle, a mountain landslide can happen anywhere that those conditions exist, Hock says. That could be in the Himalayas or in South America or in the Cascade Range in the Pacific Northwest or on the slopes of Alaska. “Wherever you have similar conditions, like warming, destabilizing of the rock, thawing of permafrost and steep slopes, you can have these mass movements,” she says.
But pinpointing the exact risk to any specific village, town or city is difficult. For one, it’s hard to know when a mountain or glacier might crack. Determining that involves having a deep understanding of the land’s features, as well as tracking possible triggers such as earthquakes, says Ben Orlove, an anthropologist who studies climate risks at Columbia University.
The equation also needs to factor in any mitigation efforts—say, early warning systems—to reduce risk and the local conditions where people live. In 2025, for instance, the Tracy Arm landslide in Alaska was so powerful that it produced a tsunami of nearly 500 meters. But because Alaska is so sparsely populated, no one was killed.
There are ways to reduce some of the risks of high-mountain hazards. Local officials can, for instance, work to prevent spills from “glacial lake outburst floods,” lakes formed by melting glaciers. Many of these lakes are not dangerous, says Olivier Gagliardini, a professor at Grenoble Alpes University in France, but if one’s walls are “not strong enough,” they can burst. In France, for example, officials have drained glacial lakes to head off potential flooding, Gagliardini says.
In other cases, evacuation is the only option, Gagliardini adds—that is certainly true for a glacial collapse or landslide on the scale of what happened in the Himalayas.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.