Trending now

City Gives Final OK To Buy Greyhound Bus Station

Chicago approved – Chicago’s City Council approved a $19.2 million purchase of the Greyhound bus station at 630 W. Harrison St., using Canal/Congress TIF funds expanded to include the terminal. The deal places the property under public ownership, while Flix will keep operating t

By the time the vote came down, the fight was no longer about whether Chicago should save the Greyhound station. It was about who pays for it—and whether a cash-strapped city should be taking on a long-term role in running intercity transit.

On Wednesday, Chicago’s City Council approved a purchasing agreement to buy the bus station at 630 W. Harrison St. for $19.2 million, clearing a major step toward preserving the terminal and keeping intercity bus service in the Near West Side.

The approval also came alongside a policy move meant to shift the funding source. Officials expanded the boundaries of the Canal/Congress Tax Increment Financing district to include the station. a change intended to provide public funding for the purchase and future improvements. It’s unclear what those improvements will cost. but an additional $30 million has been budgeted for repairs—an amount that would still need City Council approval.

The timing matters: the Greyhound station had been on a month-to-month lease with property owner Alden Global Capital since last year, after the company’s long-term lease expired.

The purchase passed with a 38-10 vote. Even supporters faced pointed doubts from alderpeople who argued the city should focus its limited money elsewhere—especially on operations, not ownership.

Ald. Marty Quinn (13th), who vehemently opposed the purchase when it was proposed in committee last week, said the city’s looming budget gap should give officials pause.

“We shouldn’t be in the business of buying property; we should be in the business of selling property. ” Quinn said. “I’m not saying. let me be clear. that we shouldn’t have buses in the city of Chicago … [but] I’m not certain the city of Chicago should be running a bus station. I’m not certain we have the finances today to be pumping $50 [million], $75 million into this endeavor.”.

Quinn’s argument landed on a familiar worry: the difference between keeping a vital service running and committing the city to costs that could balloon.

Ald. Jason Ervin (28th), whose ward borders the station, pressed back against that framing. He said the city has an obligation to preserve transportation access for people who can’t afford to travel by air or easily reach airports.

“There are people in our city that cannot afford to go to Midway or O’Hare … but yet still need to have a viable mode of transportation,” Ervin said.

Ervin also pointed out that the money would come from the Canal/Congress TIF district—not the city’s general fund.

image

For Ald. Bill Conway (34th), who represents the site, the debate hit close to home. Before the vote, Conway pleaded with colleagues, saying the alternative to buying would be harm to the community and to people relying on intercity bus travel.

Conway said he was initially “one of this project’s biggest skeptics. ” especially after learning the purchase was included in the Canal/Congress TIF plan without looping him in. But he said he came around after reviewing the transition plan. meeting with neighbors and city departments. and getting more clarity on security. operations. and traffic.

He warned that doing nothing could leave hundreds of thousands of passengers without an indoor terminal.

“Doing nothing, Conway warned, could leave hundreds of thousands passengers without an indoor terminal, or “at best waiting at the stop outside” on Harrison Street.

The scale of that risk was part of his case. The Greyhound station has served intercity bus riders since the late 1980s and now handles about 500. 000 passengers a year. including older adults. low-income riders. people with disabilities. and others who can’t or don’t drive. If it closed. Chicago would become the largest city in the northern hemisphere without an intercity bus terminal. according to a DePaul University policy brief.

“Those nearly half a million riders are not powerful people,” Conway said. “They don’t have lobbyists, they don’t write campaign checks, but they are people that matter, and they rely on affordable transportation, and they are our constituents too.”

image

Under the deal. the station would move to public ownership—but Chicago will not immediately take over day-to-day operations. according to city documents. Instead. a transition agreement signed by the city and Greyhound owner Flix would keep Flix operating and managing the station for up to 12 months after the city closes on the property.

The city also plans to launch a request for proposals to select a third-party contractor to operate the terminal.

Under the agreement, Flix will cover several operating costs, including utilities, insurance, janitorial work, trash removal, snow removal, security, and nonstructural repairs. The city, meanwhile, will be responsible for large capital improvements such as structural work and foundation repairs.

Those repairs are already looming. An assessment of the property found “deficiencies” involving the roof, HVAC, windows, and exterior doors, along with other “deferred maintenance.” The assessment did not include an estimated cost for the repairs.

Mayor Brandon Johnson, in a statement after the vote, framed the purchase as protecting an essential public asset.

“Intercity bus service connects hundreds of thousands of people to work, family, and opportunity every year. That’s not something we can take for granted,” Johnson said. “We had a responsibility to protect this essential public asset, and today we delivered. I’m proud my administration led the charge to get this done.”.

So the city got its final OK. What comes next—how the repairs are priced. how operations transition after Flix’s up-to-12-month role. and whether council ultimately approves additional funding—will determine whether the purchase becomes a stable lifeline for riders or another expensive gamble for Chicago’s budget.

Chicago City Council Greyhound bus station 630 W Harrison St Canal/Congress TIF Alden Global Capital Flix Brandon Johnson Marty Quinn Jason Ervin Bill Conway

4 Comments

  1. I don’t even get why this is such a big fight. If Flix is still operating, then what’s the city even doing besides paying more? Also $19.2 million sounds like a lot for a bus station.

  2. Wait so they’re buying it but then Flix keeps running it… so it’s basically the city renting it out? I saw somewhere they said “public ownership” like that means the buses are gonna be free or something? Unless the “future improvements” are like new bathrooms or idk. “Expanded TIF district” always sounds like hidden fees tbh.

  3. TIF funds expanded… that’s what people say right before more money gets spent and nobody knows where it ends. “Unclear what those improvements will cost” is doing a lot of work there. I’m just mad because Chicago should be fixing roads, not buying stuff that private companies already run. But I guess it’s better than losing the Greyhound station? not sure anymore.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? Please solve:Captcha