Science

Wonderwerk Cave fire evidence pushes Homo erectus flames back

New analysis of owl-pellet remains from Wonderwerk Cave suggests Homo erectus groups were using fire between about 1.7 and 1.8 million years ago—hundreds of thousands of years earlier than the prior earliest evidence from the same site.

For years, the story of when humans learned to use fire has been built on what archaeologists could find—and how cleanly those clues dated back in time. Now, traces from Wonderwerk Cave in South Africa are forcing that timeline to move.

Archaeologists report that burnt remnants dating to as far back as 1.8 million years ago were found in a cave in southern Africa. and the evidence points to regular fire use by groups of the human ancestor Homo erectus. The study was reported June 1 in PLoS One. and it shifts the earliest-known date for hominids’ use of flame back by hundreds of thousands of years.

Before this work. the earliest evidence for fire use by hominids from the same cave—Wonderwerk Cave in South Africa’s Northern Cape province—was dated to about 1 million years ago. The new findings come from an earlier and deeper layer of sediment within the cave. placing the new evidence in a dating window between 1.07 and 1.79 million years ago. Michael Chazan. a University of Toronto archaeologist who leads excavations at the cave. says he is “very comfortable saying it was between 1.7 and 1.8 million years ago.”.

The mechanism of the discovery is as indirect as it is revealing. Burnt remnants of animal bones were found in deep layers of cave sediment. positioned under previously analyzed remnants of other. later fires. Chazan and colleagues used a luminescence-based method of detecting burned bones—an approach already used in forensics but not previously applied in archaeology. The tiny bones they found were located in owl pellets. the indigestible balls of fur and bone that owls cough up after rodent-heavy meals.

Chazan says the cave was used as a shelter by barn owls (Tyto alba) throughout its period of ancient human occupation. and the burned bones were produced when fires were built on the pellet-strewn floor. In other words: the cave didn’t just hold human fire use—owl digestion and cave sediment layers helped preserve the traces long after any flames were gone.

The new dates also collide with another long-running assumption about ignition. Evidence from earlier research suggests Homo erectus could not ignite fires—nobody knew how until about 400,000 years ago. Chazan argues that means the fire behavior seen at Wonderwerk Cave likely depended on what was already burning in the landscape. In his words, “This is not human ignition of fire; it’s collecting a fire on the landscape.”.

If ignition wasn’t the point, the pattern of use still matters. One conclusion of the study is that the early fires in Wonderwerk Cave were only occasional. Chazan describes “a clear signal. but it’s not of year-round access to fire.” He says it’s likely that wildfires happened only in hot seasons. which would have made them too unpredictable to serve as the foundation for lasting lifestyle changes.

It’s a different kind of breakthrough than simply proving that early humans had flames at all. The evidence suggests Wonderwerk Cave was not a steady fire base; it was a place where people gathered heat and light when fire was available. And with the new. deeper dating—supported by a luminescence-based method and preserved through owl pellets—the question shifts from whether Homo erectus used fire to how often. how intentionally. and how dependent they were on the flames of the natural world.

Wonderwerk Cave Homo erectus fire use owl pellets barn owls luminescence-based method PLoS One archaeology South Africa Northern Cape

4 Comments

  1. I don’t know how they can even tell it was “Homo erectus” and not just some random burn layer or animals. Owl pellets doesn’t sound like a super solid way to date anything.

  2. Wait, they’re saying owl poop holds the key to fire history? Lol. Also the article says 1.07 to 1.79 million years which is like… that’s a huge range, so I’m confused how they feel “comfortable” with 1.7-1.8.

  3. This is why I don’t trust “earliest evidence” stuff. If it was 1.8 million years ago, where are the rest of the signs—tools, camps, whatever. They keep saying moved earlier by hundreds of thousands but then it’s based on burnt bones in owl pellets, which feels kinda indirect to me. Also PLoS One… sounds like one of those journals that publishes anything.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? Please solve:Captcha


Secret Link