The U.S. began mine-clearing efforts over the weekend, with CENTCOM saying it will start a “process of establishing a new passage” that will be shared “with the maritime industry soon to encourage the free flow of commerce.”
The timing is tight, and the messaging is pretty specific: CENTCOM said it would reveal more information on its plans to commercial mariners through a formal notice before the blockade started Monday. Iran, for its part, has been calling the entire situation something else—its Revolutionary Guard warned that any military vessels trying to approach Hormuz would be seen as violating the ceasefire deal Washington and Tehran agreed to, and would face a firm response.
Misryoum reporting also notes that Tehran has repeatedly ignored Trump’s demands that it reopen the waterway. Instead of relenting, Iran has started charging some ships millions of dollars to transit Hormuz. That move followed Iran’s own blockade of the strait, which not only pushed energy prices higher, but also increased the price of fertilizer and threatened the economies of countries worldwide. It’s one of those chains where the immediate impact is visible—fuel, freight, trade—and the broader ripple is harder to point at, until it shows up.
By early Monday—just hours before the blockade was set to come into effect—ships appeared to be largely steering clear of the strait. Real-time and historic vessel tracking provided by Kpler showed significantly fewer ships in the area compared to the day prior. Somewhere between those numbers and the announcements, the Strait of Hormuz turned into a kind of nervous funnel: too sensitive for routine movement, not simple enough to treat like just another shipping route. (And Sunday in Tehran, in Revolution Square, there was even a billboard reading “The Strait of Hormuz remains closed.”)
Enforcing the U.S. blockade, though, is not supposed to be easy. Andreas Krieg, a senior lecturer at King’s College London’s School of Security Studies, described it as a complicated, “high-risk” and legally contentious endeavor. Practically, he said, it would look less like a clean historical blockade and more like a messy, high-risk interdiction regime—meaning the “rules” could be a lot less tidy than the label suggests.
He added that the U.S. would likely have to identify, track, hail, divert and maybe even board vessels linked to Iranian ports, all while operating in “one of the most crowded and politically sensitive waterways in the world.” That’s where the risks pile up: Krieg said mine-clearing efforts could put American ships at risk, while “bandwidth” could become a real issue. Enforcement would probably lean on a mix of naval patrols, surveillance, maritime warnings, allied intelligence and selective interdiction. And yes, he noted that boarding could be part of it—something also seen in Venezuela, according to his assessment. Actually, the part that hangs—at least for the people watching the strait day to day—is how quickly the situation could escalate if even one ship is treated as ambiguous. Or maybe it won’t. But nobody gets to be sure.
Labor says it’s “not considering” joining US Hormuz blockade
Orbán concedes in Hungary vote after 16 years, Magyar’s Tisza projected to win
Tony Abbott calls Viktor Orbán “Trump with brains” amid thinktank uncertainty