USA Today

Second Ceasefire Looms as U.S. Iran Death Toll Rises

U.S. casualties – As the U.S. moves toward a second ceasefire with Iran, the Pentagon’s reported casualty numbers for the Iran War continue to climb—while critics say the official totals leave out hundreds of known injuries and deaths.

For a second ceasefire to take effect, the calendar doesn’t have to wait. It’s set for Friday under a preliminary deal that also points to the eventual reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

But even as American officials near the end of negotiations over the pause in fighting, the official count of U.S. casualties from the Iran War has kept rising—and questions about whether that count fully reflects what service members have experienced have not gone away.

The official number of dead and wounded U.S. personnel stands at 426, an almost 11 percent increase since the first ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran was struck on April 8. Yet that tally, critics say, is missing hundreds of casualties. They point to the Pentagon’s Defense Casualty Analysis System. or DCAS. which tracks “deceased. wounded. ill or injured” service members for Congress and the president. The true number, according to reporting referenced in the source material, exceeds 625.

Iranian leaders have marked the negotiations with a victory-lap tone. “Iran has taken a major step toward final victory,” Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, speaker of the Iranian Parliament, said on Monday. His remarks came as the U.S. and Iran agreed to the second ceasefire.

For many Americans. the human cost of the war has been counted in numbers that keep shifting—and sometimes in ways that leave painful gaps. The source material says the Trump administration’s war has killed thousands of Iranian civilians. including more than 150. most of them children. in a strike on an elementary school.

The U.S. casualty figures, however, tell a complicated story even when viewed only through Pentagon statistics.

When the first ceasefire was struck on April 8, the tally of U.S. casualties was 385. With a pause in hostilities, the number slowly rose to 428, according to Pentagon statistics. On April 21. though. the casualty total moved in a different direction: the number of wounded-in-action troops declined by 15 without public comment from the War Department. dropping the count to 413.

Since then. the source says the Pentagon has not explained the disparity in its casualty count despite repeated questions over almost two months. A defense official. quoted in the source material. said it was impossible to tell whether Pentagon casualty analysts were “grossly incompetent” or had been ordered to manipulate the figures.

From that April 21 drop. the DCAS casualty count has continued to creep upward again. topping out at 413—where it stood on Tuesday morning in the source material. That figure includes one sailor wounded in action this month. Central Command did not reply to a request for further information about the injury.

But the source material also describes casualties it says do not show up in the Pentagon’s DCAS wounded-in-action totals.

It says the official figures appear to be missing two soldiers recently wounded in action. A CENTCOM spokesperson, Capt. Tim Hawkins, told NBC News last week that two crew members from a U.S. Army AH-64 Apache helicopter downed by an Iranian drone on June 8 were receiving medical care. and that a CENTCOM social media post said they were in “stable condition.” Yet DCAS. the source material says. lists no Army personnel wounded in action this month.

Even the counts of the dead have shown fluctuations. For weeks, DCAS listed 13 hostile and non-hostile U.S. deaths during the war. The tally briefly rose to 14 last month before dropping back to 13, without explanation on the fluctuation.

One name missing from the Pentagon’s list of the dead is Maj. Sorffly Davius, a signals and communication officer with the New York Army National Guard. Davius was assigned to the headquarters of the 42nd Infantry Division and reportedly died of sudden illness while on duty in Camp Buehring. Kuwait. on March 6.

The source material says Davius’s death was widely acknowledged even as it was excluded from the official count. Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., spoke about him during a memorial service that month, and Gen. Dan Caine, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recognized Davius while “honoring our fallen.”

The source material also points to a category gap in how injuries are counted. While DCAS provides a running tally of “non-hostile” deaths—those who died from accidents or illness—it does not include “non-hostile” injuries.

In that framing. the source material says DCAS shows that 65 Navy personnel have been wounded in action. but it omits more than 200 sailors treated for smoke inhalation or lacerations due to a March 12 fire aboard the USS Gerald R. Ford. The aircraft carrier had been conducting round-the-clock flight operations to, in Gen. Caine’s words, “project combat power” in the Middle East. The ship returned to its home port in Norfolk. Virginia. last month after 326 days at sea. described in the source material as the longest deployment of any U.S. aircraft carrier since the Vietnam War.

The source material further says the casualty numbers also don’t include a sailor who suffered a non-combat-related injury aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln as it was involved in “strike missions in support of Operation Epic Fury” on March 25.

The question of accountability has lingered alongside the numbers themselves. On April 21. two Pentagon spokespersons said they were unable to field questions about why more than a dozen casualties had been disappeared by the War Department. claiming only the “duty officer” could answer but that person was not at their desk. One of those spokespersons said. “As soon as the duty officer comes back to their desk. I can get this to them.” The source material says that nearly two months later. The Intercept has yet to receive a response from the duty officer.

The Pentagon did not reply to a request for clarification on Monday about whether the duty officer ever returned to their desk.

In the lead-up to Friday’s ceasefire timetable, the contrast is stark: a diplomacy track that moves forward on schedule, and casualty tallies that keep changing—sometimes upward, sometimes downward—while gaps remain in what service members’ injuries and deaths appear to show on paper.

U.S. Iran War ceasefire Strait of Hormuz DCAS Pentagon casualties wounded in action service members national security Camp Buehring USS Gerald R. Ford USS Abraham Lincoln

4 Comments

  1. Why does it say second ceasefire like it’s just a schedule thing. If people are getting hurt how is Friday not already too late. And missing hundreds… that sounds shady.

  2. I don’t even get it like the calendar doesn’t have to wait but they wait for Friday anyway? Also 426 dead and wounded… I thought wars usually count only dead so maybe that’s why it feels low. If the system tracks “ill” and stuff then how could it miss hundreds unless the database is broken or they’re counting wrong.

  3. Every time they talk about numbers I think they’re trying to make it look less bad. Like maybe they only count what happened in the Strait of Hormuz or something, not the whole Iraq/Iran area?? Not saying that’s true, but it feels like they pick and choose what gets tracked. If critics are saying hundreds of injuries/deaths are left out then I don’t see how anyone can call that a real count.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? Please solve:Captcha