Marx Dodges ‘Fraud’ Question, Brings His Dog Instead

In Colorado’s GOP gubernatorial debate, anchor Kyle Clark pressed Victor Marx over extraordinary claims about his past—including allegations that he killed a man at age seven—asking voters how to judge whether he’s truthful or a “liar and a fraud.” Marx repeat

Colorado’s GOP gubernatorial debate this week turned strange fast—then got uncomfortably pointed.

Kyle Clark, a local 9News anchor, didn’t just challenge Victor Marx’s record in the way candidates often expect. He went point-blank. Asking whether voters should view Marx as “a liar and a fraud. ” Clark demanded a direct answer after Marx made what Clark described as “extraordinary” claims about his life.

The race already had plenty of fuel: it pits two MAGA candidates. including Marx. who is ahead in the polls. against the establishment candidate State Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer (R). And Kirkmeyer. too. had drawn attention earlier in the debate—defending once trying to lead the northern part of the state to secede.

Clark focused on Marx.

He pressed Marx with a list of specific past claims Marx has made: that he was “all around the world” and “armed to the teeth. ” that he rescued women and children from captivity. that he stopped human smugglers at the Mexico border and “made them pay a price. ” and that he. as a civilian. “called in a U.S. Military airstrike that killed 70 ISIS fighters.” Clark also referenced Marx’s claim that he was “the first American into Gaza during the war with Israel. ” that he completed “150 high-risk missions” and that “every one has been a success.”.

Then Clark brought it back to the moment voters are watching right now. Clark said Marx told him last week the story was all true and that he “don’t need to prove it to anyone.” Clark asked how voters should decide whether those claims add up—or whether Marx is “a liar and a fraud.”

Marx tried to pivot immediately, pointing not to his own record but to Kirkmeyer. “Can we back up to her for one second?. Please, please answer the question, sir. I will,” Marx said, while framing it as something voters at home don’t want. He told Clark, “The folks at home don’t want to hear about her past and what she did. That’s not gonna make a lick of difference to those who are having trouble putting food on the table. Kyle. paying their electricity bill. having to try to figure out how they send their kids to school.”.

Clark cut back in, refusing to let the question slip. “Sir, how much of your time do you plan to burn before you answer? Answer the question of whether you tell the truth,” he said.

Marx answered the question with a different question—then with a claim of proof. “Do I tell the truth?” Marx said, before insisting that documentation exists. “Well, simply go back. I have 20 years of videos and documentation and people. We just had our head of security in Iraq call in a video today. The proof is just in people and what we document,” he said.

Clark returned to the original demand: voters shouldn’t be asked to trust vibes. “How should voters discern whether you have had one of the most extraordinary lives in human history, or whether you are a liar and a fraud?” Clark pressed again.

Marx doubled down, saying he can’t help the fact that his life has been “extraordinary.” “I’m an ordinary fellow, and starting from my childhood all the way to now, me standing up on a stage running for governor,” he said.

And then he brought the moment into absurdity.

Marx pointed to a small dog next to him. “This little dog — she’s going to go bite you right now, Kyle. She was in Syria and Iraq,” Marx said, insisting as if the animal itself carried credibility. Clark fired back immediately: “So is she lying, too?”

Marx kept the focus off his claims and on the dog’s non-candidacy. “Well, the dog’s not running for governor. You’re running for governor. And you spent precious little time answering the question. other than to say that folks have to take the word of you and your staff for your accomplishments. ” Clark insisted. as Marx continued.

Clark again challenged him to stay on the question—whether voters can trust him. Marx replied, “No, no, I said thousands of people, Kyle,” as Clark moved on.

The clip, shared online, captures the debate’s core clash: Clark asked voters how they’re supposed to measure truth against claims that are so sweeping they demand evidence—while Marx fought the framing, pivoted to politics, and ended with a dog onstage instead of a direct answer.

The moment also sits inside a broader GOP field that’s already looking volatile. Marx. described as ahead in the polls. is competing against Kirkmeyer. and the debate included her own eyebrow-raising attempt to lead the northern part of the state to secede—leaving voters with two different kinds of spectacle. and one central question they may now be asking more loudly: in this race. what does “proof” actually look like—and who is willing to show it?.

Colorado politics GOP gubernatorial debate Victor Marx Kyle Clark Barbara Kirkmeyer MAGA secession accusations election 2026