USA Today

L.A. County sales tax for healthcare passes narrowly

Supporters rallied Wednesday after Los Angeles County’s Measure ER cleared the 50% threshold, pushing the countywide sales tax from 9.75% to 10.25%. The half-cent tax, starting Oct. 1 and set to sunset in five years, is meant to fund hospitals, clinics and oth

Los Angeles County’s healthcare fight looked shaky right up to the point supporters started cheering Wednesday.

The crowd celebrated what they called a historic win for a cash-strapped system after a rocky election night left people watching a measure lagging behind the margin it needed. Tuesday’s latest vote tally changed the numbers: Measure ER moved further over the 50% threshold required to pass.

The measure would impose a new half-cent sales tax countywide. Supporters say the proceeds will be used to keep local hospitals and clinics running as federal funding cuts squeeze the healthcare safety net.

Jim Mangia, the chief executive of St. John’s Community Health and a key architect of the campaign, described the effort as punishing. “Grueling and expensive,” he told the crowd Wednesday. He also aimed his words at the voters who had to shoulder the additional cost. “We had to ask an already overtaxed community — in the midst of runaway inflation and [an] affordability crisis — to tax themselves yet again. ” Mangia said.

For many residents, the familiar math was part of what made the moment feel urgent. L.A. County already has a sales tax of 9.75%, and some cities add their own on top. If Measure ER passes. the countywide sales tax would rise to 10.25%. with some individual cities having a sales tax of more than 11%. according to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.

Even with recent wins for sales taxes elsewhere in the county, some political observers had warned Measure ER could fail. They pointed to the pressure already mounting for shoppers, with skyrocketing gas prices and cost-weary voters weighing whether another tax would be worth it.

Opposition, largely informal, leaned into those household concerns. Local cities warned the additional sales tax would fall disproportionately on the poorest residents and would push shoppers to cross county borders to find lower costs. Some city leaders also argued the county had misused homelessness money generated from a previous sales tax. and they said this new pool of dollars would be handled no better.

Supporters countered with a different picture—one built around hospitals and closures. They emphasized the temporary nature of the tax, set to sunset in five years, and described it as a bridge during a period of looming disruption.

“It’s a lifesaver to carry us through the storm we’re all in,” said County Supervisor Holly Mitchell, who led the push within the Board of Supervisors to get the measure on the ballot.

County leaders had already voted to advance the plan in February, approving it 4-1 to put the tax before voters. The decision came after federal legislation threatened to pull health insurance from the poorest residents, leaving the already cash-strapped county to cover their care.

Officials say cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act are expected to slash more than $2 billion from the county’s budget for health services over the next three years. Supervisor Hilda Solis, who championed the measure alongside Mitchell, said the impact would be brutal. “It’s disgusting what’s going to happen to our residents,” she said.

The timing compounds the pressure. The tax begins Oct. 1, landing as the county faces tightening budgets marked by rising labor costs, alongside a $4-billion sex abuse settlement set to be paid out over the next five years.

County officials estimate the tax will bring in about $1 billion per year. Supporters say that money is meant for clinics, hospitals and Planned Parenthood services—and that those services are at risk of closure without a new source of cash.

The measure’s result landed against a backdrop of other regional fights. A similar proposed healthcare sales tax in Contra Costa County—designed to generate $150 million a year—was rejected, with about 57% of voters opposing the measure, according to votes tallied as of Wednesday.

In Los Angeles County, the narrowness of Measure ER’s passage underscored how high the stakes felt for both sides. At the center of the cheering Wednesday was a simple argument repeated in different forms: without new money, supporters said, care would be the first thing to break.

Los Angeles County Measure ER healthcare sales tax Holly Mitchell Hilda Solis St. John’s Community Health hospitals clinics Planned Parenthood One Big Beautiful Bill Act California Department of Tax and Fee Administration sex abuse settlement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? Please solve:Captcha


Secret Link