Indoor Fire Pit Injury Allegations
According to the lawsuit, Shaya Lerner purchased a Stonhome Tabletop Fire Pit Bowl through Amazon on December 23, 2024, for $40.87.
The purchase came just days after the CPSC expanded a warning about pooled alcohol fire pits. Stonhome also posted a safety warning on Instagram on December 27, referencing the federal alert, but the Lerners allege they were never adequately warned about the risk.
The complaint states that Amazon was later required to notify purchasers about the hazards and offer refunds intended to remove affected products from use.
On January 25, 2025, Rachel and Shaya Lerner were using the fire pit inside their home when it allegedly produced a sudden flame jet that struck Rachel and ignited her clothing.
Rachel allegedly suffered severe burns to her head, face, chest, ears and hands, resulting in ongoing medical treatment and lasting limitations. Shaya witnessed the incident and claims he suffered severe emotional distress after seeing his wife engulfed in flames.
The lawsuit alleges the fire pit was defectively designed because it required users to burn combustible isopropyl alcohol in an open container, creating a foreseeable risk of flame jetting and serious burn injuries.
The plaintiffs also claim the defendants failed to adequately test the product or provide sufficient warnings about the danger. According to the complaint, Amazon did not send the Lerners a product safety email specifically warning about the flame jetting risk until July 4, 2025, more than five months after Rachel was burned. A second email sent July 14 provided refund instructions.
“Defendants were further negligent in failing to effectively communicate to Plaintiffs a reasonable and adequate warning and instruction respecting the nature, extent, and severity of the danger of devastating injury and harm presented to consumers of the subject product, such as the Plaintiffs herein, including the negligent failure to recall the subject product in a reasonable and timely manner due to the propensity of the subject product to cause devastating injury and harm.”
— Rachel Lerner et al. v. MT Global Enterprises LLC et al.
The Lerners raise allegations of negligence, strict product liability, breach of implied warranty and breach of express warranty. Shaya also brings a “zone of danger” negligence claim based on the emotional and physical injuries he allegedly suffered after witnessing the fire engulf his wife. The complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, costs and other relief deemed appropriate by the court.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuits
Amid a growing number of recalls and reports of serious burns, attorneys are reviewing potential tabletop fire pit lawsuits nationwide for individuals injured by flame jetting, flashbacks and explosions, as well as families who lost loved ones in these incidents.
Reported injuries and losses associated with tabletop fire pits may include:
- Second- and third-degree burns requiring medical care
- Permanent scarring, disfigurement, nerve damage or reduced mobility
- Respiratory injuries from sudden flames or burning fuel
- Severe burns caused by flare-ups during refueling
- Fatal injuries following fire pit explosions
- Lost wages and reduced earning capacity
- Hospitalization, rehabilitation and other ongoing medical treatment
- Emotional and psychological trauma resulting from permanent injuries
Individuals who suffered serious burns or other injuries involving a tabletop fire pit may be entitled to financial compensation. Tabletop fire pit attorneys can investigate the device involved, determine whether it was defective or subject to a recall and explain what legal options may be available.
These claims are being handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are no upfront legal fees or expenses, and attorneys receive payment only if compensation is recovered.
Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.