If you “cut” a photon, the math breaks open

break a – Physicists model what happens when a single photon is effectively “split” by removing a mirror faster than the light wave can adapt. Instead of producing two smaller photons, their equations predict a superposition of outcomes ranging from a lone photon to a v
Try breaking a Nature Valley granola bar in half and you know it will leave crumbs everywhere. Now imagine the same impulse directed at a photon.
As fundamental particles, photons can’t really be cleaved into smaller pieces. But physicists have worked out what would follow if you tried cracking a light particle in half—not with a literal blade. but with a device fast enough to “snip” the wave of a single photon. In a paper accepted to Physical Review Letters, their calculation doesn’t yield a neat pair of photons. Instead, it predicts that up to an infinite number of new photons would crumble out.
Daniele Faccio’s first reaction was blunt. “Nonsense.” Then he read the study. “Then you read it, and I enjoyed it,” says Faccio, a physicist at the University of Glasgow in Scotland. “The technique is legit.”
The core idea starts from a fact that feels almost contradictory until you hold it in mind: photons aren’t just pointlike particles. They also act as extended waves. That wave behavior is what Johannes Skaar and his colleagues at the University of Oslo in Norway built their model around.
In their scenario, a photon travels toward a mirror. The front half of the light wave reaches the mirror first and gets bounced back in the direction it came from. Then—this is the critical move—the mirror is removed while the photon’s wave has not finished its story. The back half of the light wave, unimpeded, is suddenly free to pass through.
Using quantum equations, Skaar’s team modeled the results of that sudden disappearance. The photon’s wave is forced into a complicated blend of possibilities, or “superposition,” with different numbers of photons. When the mirror is removed infinitely fast. the math shows that the process would spew out an infinity of light particles. Infinite speed is impossible in the real world. But Skaar says that even if the mirror is pulled away more slowly. the outcome still doesn’t settle into something simple: “you end up with a possibility of several photons. or a bunch of photons.” You’re just far more likely to create smaller numbers than huge swarms.
That still sounds strange to him, too. “This is a bit strange,” allows Skaar. But he argues that quantum mechanics has a way of making the unfamiliar feel routine. Physicists already knew that disturbing supposedly “empty” space—known as a vacuum—can knock new photons loose. In this case, the energy fed into the system by moving the mirror could spawn new light particles.
The most unsettling part of the model comes when you ask what an observer would actually see. Skaar points to the difference between looking at both sides of the mirror at once and looking at just one.
If you had a view of both sides of the mirror at once, the system would show a messy eruption: up to bajillions of photons. But with a restriction to only one side—either one or the other—the observation would be dramatically simpler. You’d witness either a single photon or a vacuum.
“That is really crazy,” says Skaar.
He hopes to probe that split outcome more deeply in future work. He also wants to test what happens if you try sever other kinds of fundamental particles that act like waves in quantum physics, such as electrons.
For now, it’s not immediately clear where this could lead. Faccio doesn’t pretend otherwise. “I’m going to speculate wildly here. ” he says. but adds that it might matter because people already do “funky things” with photons for sensing and measuring. Gravitational wave catchers are one example he points to. Probing the nature of individual photons, he says, might be useful in fields that rely on such quantum sensors.
photon quantum physics Physical Review Letters vacuum fluctuations quantum sensing gravitational wave detectors Johannes Skaar Daniele Faccio University of Oslo University of Glasgow
So they basically tried to slice light and now it makes infinite photons?? That can’t be real lol.
I read the headline and thought “cut a photon” like with a laser, but it sounds more like deleting a mirror at the last second. Still, “infinite number of photons” sounds like clickbait math to me.
Wait so the mirror gets removed while the photon is still “in the middle”?? That’s wild. But if photons can’t actually be cut, then how are they getting more photons out of nowhere… sounds like they’re just saying superposition words.
“Infinite number of new photons would crumble out” made me laugh, like the granola bar analogy but for physics. Also why does it say “v” at one point? Anyway I don’t get why you remove the mirror instead of just moving it slow so the wave adapts… seems like they’re cheating the setup.