ClickUp’s AI layoffs push a sharper work future

ClickUp’s AI – ClickUp CEO Zeb Evans says the company laid off 22% of its workforce as a “radical embrace of AI,” aiming to turbocharge the company into a “100x org.” The move, paired with thousands of internal AI agents and a new pay philosophy tied to AI-driven impact, spo
Last Thursday, Zeb Evans didn’t frame ClickUp’s next chapter as a retreat from hiring. He framed it as an upgrade.
On X, the CEO announced that the collaboration software startup has laid off 22% of its workforce. He also stressed the reduction wasn’t a cost-cutting move. ClickUp. which was last valued in 2021 at $4 billion. was doing something else. he said: preparing to “radically embrace” AI to propel the company to the next level.
In the post, Evans wrote that most of the savings from the change will flow directly back into the people who stay. ClickUp plans to introduce “million-dollar salary bands.” The promise is simple: create outsized impact using AI, and you’ll be paid outside of traditional bands.
The layoffs landed alongside a bigger operational shift inside the company. ClickUp has introduced roughly 3,000 internal AI agents meant to handle a wide range of complex tasks on behalf of employees. Staff members are no longer expected to do everything themselves; instead. they’re expected to direct these agents and then review the output to make sure it meets ClickUp’s standards.
Evans’s stated goal is for the company to become a “100x org.” ClickUp is betting that AI agents can stretch what smaller teams can deliver—at least, that’s the story it wants employees and customers to believe.
But the industry context is harder to ignore. AI’s biggest champions have argued for years that technology will unlock unprecedented productivity gains, benefiting the workers who can harness it while displacing those who don’t.
ClickUp isn’t alone in that pitch. A recent Gartner survey found that about 80% of companies using autonomous tech have cut jobs. The same study also found those workforce reductions aren’t necessarily translating into meaningful financial returns.
ClickUp, for its part, insists this is different. Evans told TechCrunch via email that the startup is seeing productivity gains from AI agents. He said ClickUp is measuring efficiencies internally and is gearing up to include those gains in a forthcoming product for its customers.
In the email, Evans also said ClickUp is shifting how it thinks about incentives: “Instead of gamifying token cost, we gamify value created and time saved.”
That distinction matters in a debate that’s been growing inside tech circles. In recent months. more companies have started monitoring employee token consumption—using it as a metric to see who is actually adopting AI tools. Critics argue that “tokenmaxxing,” the practice of chasing token usage, is the wrong measure because it mostly drives AI spending.
Evans pushed back on that approach directly in his X post. “The people that automate their jobs with AI will always have a job.” But there’s a cold logic under the optimism: if AI keeps taking over more tasks. ClickUp will need fewer and fewer people—eventually eliminating those who don’t automate their functions well.
The idea isn’t just theoretical. Tech circles have been watching an extreme example: Polsia. a one-year-old startup that claims to handle all software operations for solopreneurs. Polsia is run by just one person—its founder and CEO, Ben Broca. Polsia’s efficiency appears to be paying off: the startup just raised $30 million at a $250 million valuation.
ClickUp’s layoffs. paired with internal AI agents and its push toward “million-dollar salary bands. ” make one thing unmistakable: the future of work being sold here isn’t simply about using AI. It’s about being judged—and compensated—based on how effectively you can turn that AI into measurable output.
ClickUp Zeb Evans layoffs AI agents autonomous technology future of work tokenmaxxing Gartner Polsia Ben Broca
So they laid off 22%… cuz AI. Cool cool.
They say it’s not cost cutting but then do layoffs and call it “radical embrace.” Sounds like cost cutting with extra steps lol. Also “million-dollar salary bands” like who even gets those?
Wait I thought internal AI agents means the company will fire more people automatically. Like the agents replace jobs and then they’re like “direct it and review” which is basically the same job just with more screens. Also “100x org” sounds like hype from a VC deck, not real life.
I’m not mad at AI but this “100x org” thing always ends with the rest of us doing the work of 3 people. They say savings flow back to the people who stay, but that’s always the top performers anyway. And if there’s 3,000 AI agents… are they actually good or is it just gonna generate extra mess for humans to clean up?