Business

Artemis III crew revealed as New Glenn fallout bites

NASA has named the Artemis III crew and set in-orbit testing goals for a 2028 lunar mission timeline—while the program’s momentum is tested by the May 28 Blue Origin New Glenn explosion and the uncertain pace of pad rebuilds.

When the Artemis II crew carried their baton during a ceremony, it looked like pure tradition. But the timing told a different story: less than two weeks after the catastrophic explosion of Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket. NASA moved fast to name the Artemis III team and lay out what comes next for its march toward a 2028 moon landing.

Artemis III will be unlike anything NASA has undertaken before. Next year. the astronauts—including NASA’s Randy Bresnik. Andre Douglas. and Frank Rubio. and the European Space Agency’s Luca Parmitano—will spend two weeks in orbit testing maneuverability and compatibility between the space capsule and two landers. The aim is to help ready Artemis IV, described as the first crewed mission to the Lunar South Pole in 2028.

“A multi-launch campaign bringing together the most powerful rockets in the world to test rendezvous, docking, and interoperability across multiple systems close to Earth before we return astronauts to the lunar surface,” NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman posted on X.

From Kennedy to low Earth orbit, Orion will be the hub. NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) will launch the Orion spacecraft from Kennedy Space Center to low Earth orbit. There. Orion’s crew will practice rendezvous and docking maneuvers with the Blue Origin Blue Moon and SpaceX Starship lander test models competing to carry humans from lunar orbit to the surface and back during Artemis IV. Orion will dock for several days with each lander. letting the crew run in-space trials assessing life support. hatch operations. communications. propulsion systems. and Axiom Space’s new spacesuits—while also guiding development of the landers. After Artemis III. both Blue Origin and SpaceX will stage several uncrewed demonstrations to the lunar surface in 2028. ahead of Artemis IV.

During a Tuesday press conference. Artemis program manager Jeremy Parsons said. “As the first crewed Artemis mission with commercial spacecraft. this test flight will enable us to prove we can carry out highly choreographed operations with our partners across systems and launch pads. says Artemis program manager Jeremy Parsons during a Tuesday press conference. “We want to do this in Earth’s orbit before we return to the moon and establish an enduring presence there.”.

The human baton, and the argument beneath it

At the ceremony, Artemis II crew members ceremoniously passed a baton they’d carried on their successful lunar flyby to the Artemis III team.

For Bresnik and Parmitano, it’s not a first. The mission marks the third spaceflight for both Artemis III commander Resnik and pilot Parmitano. Parmitano’s helmet famously filled with water during a 2013 spacewalk. Parmitano is also the first ESA astronaut assigned to an Artemis mission. Mission specialist Rubio—described as a physician and record-holder for the longest single-duration spaceflight by an American astronaut—will make his second trip to space. But for mission specialist Andre Douglas, it’s a different kind of milestone: his first spaceflight. Douglas is an Artemis II backup astronaut.

NASA astronaut Bob Hines, who’s logged 170 days in space, will serve as the backup crew member.

“We’ve been carrying this baton around for way too long,” said Artemis II commander Reid Wiseman. “So, with that, the Artemis II crew hands you the baton. You got the controls.”

Bresnik replied, “We’re honored to be able to carry this torch forward,” Bresnik responded. “To be able to execute our mission, to make that flame burn brighter, and pass it on to the next crew.”

Even as celebrations played out, NASA moved to address frustration about an all-male crew. The day after, Isaacman explained that astronauts are chosen for specific skill sets. “The Astronaut Office assigns the crew that gives the mission the best chance of meeting its objectives. taking into account many factors. including the background and expertise of the astronauts. such as test pilot experience. development work on specific programs. and availability.”.

Artemis III also has a science job. Because it’s a technical mission. the science team will study how space weather affects Earth’s atmosphere to better understand how to protect and monitor spacecraft and crew health. NASA says the data could inform new kinds of instruments measuring increased radiation beyond Earth’s magnetosphere. orbital decay caused by solar flares. or contaminants that compromise lunar samples and crew wellness.

Nicki Fox, the associate administrator for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, framed it as preparation for the journey itself: “Think of it [as] if you’re going on a road trip, you need to prepare a game plan, not just for your destination, but for driving through all of the states in between.”

What the schedule is up against

image

The upbeat Artemis III briefing came with the shadow of the New Glenn accident. The May 28 Blue Origin New Glenn rocket explosion threatened to delay the Artemis moon landing schedule, which NASA says is just slightly ahead of China’s 2030 target.

The heavy-lift rocket erupted in a fireball during a static test fire at Cape Canaveral. severely damaging the company’s only working launch pad. Later this year. the rocket had been slated to launch Blue Origin’s Blue Moon Mark 1 lander and NASA payloads to the Lunar South Pole as part of the first phase in establishing a Moon Base.

With the cause under investigation, Blue Origin plans to rebuild the launch pad. But timing remains contested. On June 1, Blue Origin CEO Dave Limp posted that the company will accomplish this before the end of this year. Others have suggested 2027 or later.

NASA’s Parsons urged confidence that the Artemis path can survive the disruption. “While we recognize there are questions about how Blue Origin’s recent anomaly impacts our plans. setbacks are a learning opportunity. ” Parsons said. “We are confident that New Glenn will be ready for Artemis III together with Blue Origin.”.

Kathleen Curlee. a space economy research analyst at Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology. pushed back on the timeline. “That’s pretty ambitious and unrealistic given all the factors that go into this. ” she says in response to Limp’s comment. “I think it’s a year and a half to two years that they’ll be grounded. Unless someone else lets them use their launchpad. I don’t think they’ll launch by the end of the year. A more viable path would be for Blue Origin to rebuild. but this is a significant financial investment and a lengthy process. with a lot of permitting.”.

Changing launchpads is seen as unlikely because there is a dearth of available pods capable of handling heavy-lift rockets. and adapting them to a new rocket is difficult. Blue Origin is building a second pad at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California at the same time. but it’s still wending its way through regulatory hurdles.

There is also a technical fallback idea: flying the Blue Moon on a SpaceX Falcon Heavy or ULA Vulcan Centaur rocket. But with Vulcan still grounded. the Falcon Heavy is described as the more likely backup—and it would require modifying both the rockets’ payload fairings and the lander propulsion system.

Curlee said the setback underscores how hard launching really is. despite the frequency of modern rocket launches: “We’re spoiled with the idea that a launch is sort of easy and not a big deal anymore because we’re launching rockets every other week. ” Curlee said. “But it is a very difficult technical challenge to get a rocket into space. Seeing other launch providers struggle reemphasizes how much work is needed to come up with a reliable competitor.”.

Between the ceremony and the crash report, the reality is simple: Artemis III is moving ahead, but Artemis’s broader timetable now depends on how quickly the industry can close the gap between test chaos and launch readiness.

Artemis III NASA SLS Orion Blue Origin New Glenn Blue Moon SpaceX Starship Lunar South Pole 2028 Luca Parmitano Randy Bresnik Andre Douglas Frank Rubio Bob Hines Jeremy Parsons Jared Isaacman Cape Canaveral launch pad

4 Comments

  1. New Glenn blew up and now NASA is like “yup anyway” 😬 How does that not push everything back by like years? Also why is Artemis always “next year”?

  2. They said Artemis III is in orbit testing maneuverability with two landers, right? So basically they’re testing the landers before building them? That’s what it sounds like to me. Pad rebuilds are “uncertain” and they want 2028… seems optimistic.

  3. I don’t trust any of this, because that Blue Origin explosion means somebody messed up on the rocket and now they’re just rushing names out. “Randy Bresnik” and Frank Rubio—weren’t they on something already? Feels like a copy/paste mission plan. Space agencies always say 2028 and then it’s 2035, mark my words.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? Please solve:Captcha


Secret Link

Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, null given in /home/misryoum/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-defender/src/component/class-network-cron-manager.php on line 216