We need your help now Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open. You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough. If you’ve seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it. One-off amount I already contribute Sign in. It’s quick, free
and it’s up to you. An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more. Investigates Investigates Money Diaries The Journal TV By-Elections 2026 Climate Crisis Cost of Living Road Safety Newsletters Temperature Check Inside the Newsroom The Journal Investigates Daft.ie Property Allianz Home The 42 Sport TG4 Entertainment Domino’s Best of the Box The Explainer A deep dive into one big news story Sport meets news, current affairs, society & pop culture have your say Or create a free
account to join the discussion Advertisement More Stories Alamy Stock Photo wearable tech Tech dubbed ‘creepy’ AI smart glasses are here, but our privacy laws have not caught up As the use of AI smart glasses becomes more common, concerns about covert filming, consent and child-safety implications are growing and the laws we have in place are inadequate. 7.01pm, 21 May 2026 Share options ACROSS IRELAND AND most recently in Cork, concerns have been raised about people being filmed using AI-powered smart glasses without their
consent. While wearable technology is developing rapidly and offers exciting possibilities, these incidents highlight why Ireland needs a more serious conversation about privacy, consent and regulation before this technology becomes more widespread. Meta’s smart glasses, developed in partnership with Ray Ban, are designed to look almost identical to ordinary glasses. That is part of their appeal. But it also creates challenges when it comes to informing people that a recording may be taking place. Unlike holding up a phone camera, wearable devices can record discreetly
and hands-free, making it far more difficult for people to know when they are being filmed. The only built-in signal currently intended to alert people to recording is a small LED light. However, concerns have already been raised about whether this is enough. Ireland’s Data Protection Commission previously questioned whether proper field-testing was carried out to establish if the indicator works effectively in real-life situations. Reports from Cork have also suggested that, in some cases, the light may have been covered or disabled. Alamy Stock
Photo Alamy Stock Photo That creates understandable worry, particularly for women and workers in customer-facing roles who may feel they are being recorded without their knowledge in cafés, shops, workplaces or other everyday settings. I also have concerns about child safety and public safety when it comes to these AI glasses. Invasion of privacy and safety concerns This week, the Oireachtas Committee on Artificial Intelligence heard from the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) and the Children’s Rights Alliance on the broader issue of AI-generated
images, deepfakes and consent. These discussions followed reports earlier this year that harmful AI “nudification” tools became more widely available online. When I asked in the Oireachtas Committee this week whether AI Smart Glasses should be allowed in Ireland, the ICCL was clear in its reply that these glasses are ‘creepy’ and need regulation. Advertisement The pace at which this technology is developing has created clear gaps in regulation, both in Ireland and across the European Union. EU institutions have provisionally agreed on new rules
to prohibit AI systems that generate child sexual abuse material or non-consensual intimate imagery, but implementation may still take time. In the meantime, lawmakers are left trying to respond to technologies that are evolving much faster than the systems designed to regulate them. Smart glasses are one example of where we need to be more proactive. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Of course, this technology is not inherently negative. Smart glasses have important uses, particularly in accessibility for people with vision loss and other
disabilities. Wearable AI could also bring benefits in education, navigation and communication. Innovation should not be discouraged simply because there are risks attached. Catching up with tech But innovation and accountability must go hand in hand. As these devices become more mainstream, it is reasonable for the public to expect clear safeguards around consent and privacy. People deserve to know when they are being recorded, particularly in sensitive settings such as schools, workplaces or healthcare environments. This issue is likely to become even more relevant
in the coming years. Snap Inc, the parent company of Snapchat, has announced plans for a consumer debut of its Specs smart glasses in 2026, potentially bringing this technology to an even younger audience. That raises important questions around child privacy and online safety that we cannot ignore. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo There also needs to be greater transparency from companies such as Meta, Ray Ban and Snap around how recorded data is stored, processed and potentially used in the future. As AI
develops, there are growing concerns internationally around facial recognition, biometric data and the creation of manipulated or synthetic images using real people’s likenesses. Existing legislation around CCTV, surveillance and data protection was not written with wearable AI technology in mind. That means governments now need to examine whether current laws are sufficient for devices that can discreetly record audio, video and images in public spaces. Related Reads The war on human thought: Educational institutions must take back control from AI AI not so ready: The
government’s new tech literacy platform needs some improvement Melania and the robot: Humanoids are here, but they can’t replace humanity Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Ireland has an opportunity to lead on this issue rather than waiting for more serious problems to emerge before taking action. There are practical steps we can begin considering now: clearer recording indicators, stronger protections against covert filming, guidance around the use of smart glasses in sensitive settings and updated data protection rules that reflect how wearable AI technology
actually operates. Technology will continue to evolve, and in many ways that is a positive thing. But public trust in new technology depends on people feeling their privacy and rights are being respected. That is why now is the right time to put sensible guardrails in place around AI-powered smart glasses before their use becomes far more widespread in everyday life. Senator Laura Harmon of the Labour Party is a member of the Oireachtas Committee on Artificial Intelligence. Readers like you are keeping these stories
free for everyone. A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Support The Journal Laura Harmon Viewcomments Send Tip or Correction Embed this post To embed this post, copy the code below on your site Email “Tech dubbed ‘creepy’: AI smart glasses are here, but our privacy laws have not caught up”. Recipient’s Email Feedback on
“Tech dubbed ‘creepy’: AI smart glasses are here, but our privacy laws have not caught up”. Your Feedback Your Email (optional) Report a Comment Please select the reason for reporting this comment. Please give full details of the problem with the comment. This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy before taking part. Leave a Comment Submit a report Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines. Damaging the good reputation
of someone, slander, or libel. Racism or Hate speech An attack on an individual or group based on religion, race, gender, or beliefs. Trolling or Off-topic An attempt to derail the discussion. Inappropriate language Profanity, obscenity, vulgarity, or slurs. Advertising, phishing, scamming, bots, or repetitive posts. Please provide additional information Thank you for the feedback Your feedback has been sent to our team for review. Leave a commentcancel Name not provided Newly created accounts can only comment using The Journal app. This is to add
an extra layer of security to account creation. Download and sign into the app to continue. Access to the comments facility has been disabled for this user View our policy ⚠️ Duplicate comment Post Comment have your say Or create a free account to join the discussion PERSONAL SPACE TECH GLASSES wearable tech News in 60 seconds First of Gaza Flotilla activists deported from Israel arrive in Istanbul 46 mins ago Man jailed for five years for St Stephen’s Day hit-and-run collision which killed married
couple 32 mins ago ‘Feeling of dread’: Woman speaks out on controlling behaviour by garda husband 58 mins ago yves sakila Yves Sakila’s family call for postmortem report as large protest takes place outside Dáil Eimer McAuley Enoch Burke officially sacked by Wilson’s Hospital School after appeals panel upholds decision Nearly 90% of Dublin’s data centres are located in economically deprived communities PodcastThe Candidate What a byelection silver medal would mean for Sinn Féin global sumud flotilla Taoiseach ‘appalled’ by Israeli minister’s video showing Gaza
flotilla activists with hands bound trevor bolger Garda convicted of assaulting his spouse wins stay on dismissal due at midnight Former teacher to be sentenced next month after pleading guilty to 132 offences against 19 boys UK radio station apologises after mistakenly announcing death of Britain’s King Charles more from us Investigates Money Diaries The Journal TV By-Elections 2026 Journal Media Advertise With Us Gender Pay Gap Report ’25 About FactCheck Our Network FactCheck Knowledge Bank Terms & Legal Notices Terms of Use Cookies &
Privacy Advertising Competition more from us TV Listings GAA Fixtures The Video Review Journal Media Advertise With Us Gender Pay Gap Report ’25 Our Network The Journal FactCheck Knowledge Bank Terms & Legal Notices Terms of Use Cookies & Privacy Advertising Competition © 2026 Journal Media Ltd Terms of Use Cookies & Privacy Advertising Competition Switch to Desktop Switch to Mobile The Journal supports the work of the Press Council of Ireland and the Office of the Press Ombudsman, and our staff operate within the
Code of Practice. You can obtain a copy of the Code, or contact the Council, at https://www.presscouncil.ie, PH: (01) 6489130, Lo-Call 1800 208 080 or email: mailto:info@presscouncil.ie Report an error, omission or problem: Your Email (optional) Create Email Alert Create an email alert based on the current article Email Address One email every morning As soon as new articles come online
AI smart glasses, privacy, consent, Cork, Data Protection Commission, Oireachtas Committee on Artificial Intelligence, ICCL, children’s rights, deepfakes, nudification, Meta Ray Ban, Snap Specs