Politics

The GOP’s Incredible Shrinking Senate Map



Politics


/
September 22, 2026

Trump has so badly damaged the Republican Party’s brand that strategists are contemplating bitter fights—and losses—in races they’d been banking on as sure things.

President Donald Trump at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas earlier this month.

(Andrew Harnik / Getty Images)

If you obsessively read or write about politics, you’ve probably lost track of the number of times that political reporters happened upon major-party operatives in “panic mode.” Just this week, Democrats were said to be sounding an “alarm” because of a single poll in the New Hampshire open-seat Senate race showing a dead heat. But the struggle ahead for the GOP this year more than justifies the panic framing. Republican strategists are starting to see the birds head out to sea and the faint outline of an inbound tsunami. When the wave hits in early November, Republican Senate candidates—even in deep-red states like South Carolina, Kansas, and Florida—could be frantically bailing their way out before a Democratic surge without precedent in the past two decades.

Media attention to this development is overly focused on individual polls. And yes, there have been a handful of eyebrow-raising Senate surveys showing Democratic candidates like Florida’s Angie Nixon running even with their opponents in Republican strongholds. But Democrats are dreaming about these races not just because they’re high on hopium and a smattering of polls show their candidates within striking distance of a win. They’re taking their cues from broader structural shifts in the national political environment.

If recent polls are to be believed, this could be, in raw popular vote totals, the biggest blowout national election of the 21st century—one that has at least a chance of delivering the kind of victory Democrats have spent more than a decade hoping for. Last week, the comparatively staid New York Times/Siena College poll pegged the Democrats lead on the generic ballot at nearly nine points. Remember that in the two big GOP midterm waves of this century—2010 and 2014—Republicans won the national House popular vote by 6.8 and 5.7 points, respectively. The Democratic wave of 2018 was 8.6 points, the high-water mark for any midterm election this century.

Neither party has won a double-digit popular vote victory in a midterm election since Democrats in 1982, halfway through Ronald Reagan’s first term. But this pattern looks very much like it could change this year. In data guru Nate Silver’s generic ballot model, Democrats have opened up their biggest lead of the cycle at 8.6 points.

And there’s still worse news for Republicans: The GOP’s average reading in this measure is down since the spring—a sign of real erosion in support that lines up with the big drop in President Trump’s approval rating over the same period. Given this overall trend, there’s also ample space and time for the Democratic lead to grow—especially in light of the president’s apparent determination to inflict as much damage on his own party as possible. When you get past a 10-point lead on the generic ballot—which a number of surveys already show happening—the firewalls start to break.

The reasons for Democrats’ optimism are not a mystery. The president spent 2025 burning through his political capital on a nationwide ICE reign of terror, an indiscriminate slash-and-burn evisceration of the federal government, a slapdash tariff war, and an orgy of unapologetic self-dealing that would make Mobutu Sese Seko blush. Trump’s record was so bad that a record number of Democrats had emerged as favorites to claim a House majority by the end of last year. At that point, Trump maintained a high enough approval rating to make GOP control of the Senate a near-certainty. What’s more, the economy was growing, the stock market booming, and inflation within range of stability—all traditionally encouraging metrics for the party in power in Washington.

Current Issue

Cover of October 2026 Issue

Then came 2026. The year started with an embarrassing effort to use the DOJ to scrub Trump’s involvement in the notorious international sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein’s files—one of many own-goals the president has scored on himself since taking office again. Having spent a decade railing against “forever wars” in the Middle East, Trump then made the inexplicable decision to attempt a decapitation of the Iranian government. The caper has gone so badly that it has single-handedly given the country’s autocrats a new lease on life, made the entire US strategic position in the Middle East look untenable, and triggered a cascading global economic crisis.

Not content to suffer this brutal but politically survivable humiliation, Trump has elected not to take any of the many off-ramps that have been offered to him. Even now, he could relieve some of the electoral pressure on his congressional lickspittles by simply allowing Iran to control the Strait of Hormuz, which would begin the long process of bringing down energy prices. But Trump is so profoundly vain and ignorant that he just can’t bring himself to do it, since a climbdown in Hormuz would involve at least an implicit acknowledgement that the war was a terrible mistake.

Now with bond markets in turmoil, the stock market declining, interest rates rising to get the Iran-driven inflation disaster under control, and spiking energy prices that may tip multiple countries into complete social mayhem, Trump keeps firing off the dumbest remarks imaginable. On Wednesday, he called skyrocketing gas prices a “very inexpensive price to pay for what we’ve done” in Iran—a few months after declaring that he wasn’t “thinking at all” about the finances of Americans as he prosecuted the war. He’s doing the job of Democratic ad-makers for them.

On top of all this, the president is stumbling around like a blackout drunk picking fights with anyone he runs into, up to and including our historically mild-mannered northern neighbor Canada. To put a flourish on his rudderless megalomania, he continues to campaign to rename things after himself or America—and when it looks like he may not get his way, to threaten their demolition. If you sat down and came up with a 10-point plan to alienate unaffiliated and Republican-leaning independents as thoroughly as possible, you couldn’t do better than this.

What’s the upshot of all of this madness? Democrats have already gone from longshots to betting favorites in enough Senate races to take back the majority. In Ohio, Texas, and Alaska, Democratic candidates have taken the lead, with top-line numbers high enough for party leaders to be reasonably confident that undecided voters can’t save the day for the MAGA right by breaking for the Republican candidate at the 11th hour. All three states voted for Trump by double digits in 2024, and a loss in any of those three races would have been seen as a catastrophe by Republicans a year ago. Today, they would probably feel fortunate to win any one of the three—to say nothing of Iowa, where Nate Silver’s model gives Democrat Josh Turek a 44 percent chance of prevailing.

But the fallout from what is easily the most catastrophic policy year overseen by any US president since 2008 may drift further downwind than that. Take South Carolina. Six years ago, Democrat Jaime Harrison came within 10 points of unseating the late Lindsey Graham, in a year where Democrats carried the House popular vote by just 3.1 points. Over the summer, when Graham died suddenly, Trump made the baffling decision to strongarm South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster into appointing Graham’s sister Darline Graham Nordone to the seat. With Trump’s backing, she won the August primary for the seat despite a series of embarrassing campaign gaffes.

Guess what? South Carolina is now on the big board, and Democrats can send their thanks directly to the White House. They have an appealing outsider candidate in pediatrician Annie Andrews—and Republicans are stuck with a clueless nepo-senator handpicked by America’s geriatric chief executive.

In Florida, the usual suspects threw a fit when Democratic primary voters chose progressive Angie Nixon over the establishment’s wet potato of a candidate, Alex Vindman, one of the last of the mostly forgettable cast of characters who got their 15 seconds of fame during Trump’s first impeachment. Instead, Nixon is running what looks to be a competitive race against Republican Senator Ashley Moody, who was appointed to her seat by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis so that Marco Rubio could incompetently perform multiple completely different, ostensibly full-time jobs in the Trump administration.

Since 1990, only 77 percent of senators running for their first reelection have won—a number well below the incumbent reelection percentage for the chamber. And there’s no particular reason to think that Florida, which Trump carried by 13 points in 2024, should be more out of reach for Democrats than Texas, Iowa, or Alaska—all of which he also won by 13 points.

The fun doesn’t stop there for the GOP. Independent Dan Osborn has led multiple surveys over incumbent billionaire Republican Pete Ricketts in Nebraska, although high-quality polling there has been scarce. In Kansas, an Emerson College/Nexstar Media poll last week found Democrat Adam Hamilton with a one-point lead over incumbent Republican Roger Marshall—far from the only survey there to show a close race. While we have nothing but partisan-sponsored polls of the Senate race in deep-red South Dakota, several have shown a tight contest; one has Democratic challenger Brian Bengs running even with two-term incumbent Mike Rounds. Republicans might want to get surveys in the field for every race in the country, lest election night deliver some truly unforeseen disasters.

Hang out with me here in the Hopium Den for just one more minute. Let’s say Democrats win all of the seats they’re defending plus flips in North Carolina, Maine, Alaska, Ohio, Texas, Iowa. Throw in two out of what you might call the longshot bucket of Nebraska, Florida, Kansas, and South Carolina. That eight-seat gain would give them 55 seats and a real, if highly improbable, shot at getting to 60 seats in 2028 by flipping upcoming races in Iowa, Alaska, Missouri, Wisconsin, and North Carolina. This is basically what happened between 2006 and 2008, when an almost unimaginably bad national environment for Republicans with structurally similar causes delivered a series of fluke wins for Democrats in hostile partisan territory and briefly gave them a filibuster-proof majority.

What they did with that miracle and what they would do with another one is another question entirely. But for perhaps the first time in the Trump era, Democrats are really on the march, and there might not be more than a handful of truly safe Republicans in the Senate.

Between the reemergence of right-wing red-baiting and Donald Trump’s use of the chilling National Security Presidential Memorandum–7 to criminalize left political organizing, we’re seeing McCarthyism reborn before our eyes.

This assault on democracy cannot be ignored or wished away. Resisting it requires bravery in the face of threats and repression, a steadfast commitment to the truth, and the unwavering belief that we can—and will—overcome this darkness.

We must have an independent media that sets the record straight, unearths corruption and abuses of power, and advances a politics of justice and dignity for all if we’re to win this fight.

That’s why I’m writing to you today. This September, The Nation needs to add 100 monthly donors to sustain our progressive journalism. Your contribution makes the next investigative report, the next truth-speaking column, and the next pathbreaking essay all possible. 

I hope you’ll support our work with a recurring donation today. If you donate $10 or more a month, we’ll send you a brand new “Hands Off the Free Press!” sticker to recognise your commitment to our cause. Please, donate today. 

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

David Faris

David Faris is a professor of political science at Roosevelt University and the author of It’s Time to Fight Dirty: How Democrats Can Build a Lasting Majority in American Politics. His writing has appeared in Slate, The Week, The Washington Post, The New Republic, and Washington Monthly. You can find him on Bluesky at @davidfaris.bluesky.social.

More from The Nation

Texas Democratic gubernatorial candidate Gina Hinojosa speaks during the Texas Democratic Convention at the Hilliard Center in Corpus Christi.

Texas gubernatorial candidate Gina Hinojosa is proposing a progressive agenda. In the primary, she got twice as many votes as Beto O’Rourke did in 2018.

StudentNation

/

Lajward Zahra

The White House Briefing room, on September 19, 2026, in Washington, DC.

The president has banned MS NOW, CNN, and Politico from attending press briefings. The rest of the media should respond with a boycott.

Chris Lehmann

: Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) addresses the crowd during 'Get Out the Vote (GOTV)' rally at the Kings Theatre in Brooklyn in New York City, United States on June 18, 2026.

Exclusive: Read the text of a major foreign policy address delivered by the independent senator at Riverside Church.

Sen. Bernie Sanders

Pete Hegseth speaks at an Oshkosh Corporation facility in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, US, on Monday, Aug. 24, 2026.

Hegseth was always a horrible choice for defense secretary. At long last, some in the GOP are admitting it.

Jeet Heer

Clear Sign: Stop Gun Violence

Claiming over 130 American lives daily, a lethal epidemic is scarring our communities.

OppArt

/

Wilhelmina Grant

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson at the Capitol on September 16, 2026.

His decision to shut the House down at a moment of crisis around AI is the act of a reckless charlatan.

John Nichols


Secret Link