A Massachusetts jury found Stefon Diggs not guilty of assault and strangulation charges, ending a short trial after two days of proceedings.
Stefon Diggs is cleared of serious charges after a Massachusetts jury returned a not guilty verdict on allegations tied to an incident at his home.
According to Misryoum, the jury found the free-agent wide receiver not guilty of strangulation and assault and battery. Deliberations reportedly lasted about 90 minutes, with the jury briefly seeking clarification from the judge before delivering its decision.
For Diggs, the outcome is a turning point as he prepares for what comes next in his professional career, while the court case reaches its conclusion.
The two-day trial featured testimony from Diggs’ former live-in chef, Jamila “Mila” Adams, who alleged Diggs slapped and choked her during an argument on Dec. 2. Diggs, who had entered a not guilty plea, was present in Dedham District Court for the verdict.
Misryoum notes that the defense challenged the credibility of the prosecution’s evidence. arguing that prosecutors did not establish that an assault occurred.. In closing. the defense pointed to questions about the underlying motivation for the dispute. including financial demands raised during the case.
From a broader perspective, cases like this can quickly dominate headlines around star athletes, making the court’s decision a key moment for both public perception and personal focus.
After the verdict, Diggs was not found liable on either count, bringing an end to the matter following the trial’s wrap-up. The case also included moments where the defense pressed for clarity during testimony, particularly around disputed details connected to the allegations.
What happens next will likely shift attention back to football, as Diggs weighs the path forward in the offseason. For fans and the league alike, Misryoum expects the focus to move from the courtroom back to performance and team developments.