NRM lawmakers threw their weight behind Uganda’s Sovereignty Bill, arguing it protects decision-making autonomy as security heightens around Parliament.
Uganda’s Sovereignty Bill has gained a clear boost from the ruling NRM caucus, with lawmakers framing it as a shield for national decision-making.
In support of the Sovereignty Bill, NRM MP Kakooza said the proposal is meant to reinforce Uganda’s right to govern itself without “undue external influence,” arguing that choices on Uganda’s direction should be made through elections and participation by Ugandans.
His comments also pointed to what Misryoum describes as past moments when Uganda acted despite international pressure, presenting them as proof that the country can assert independence even when powerful institutions react.
Kakooza cited the decision to pass the Anti-Homosexuality law as an example, arguing that adopting a position meant standing firm rather than yielding to outside views. He added that economic institutions withdrawing support did not erase Uganda’s ability to function.
Misryoum notes that this is why the Bill’s language has become politically sensitive: it touches both national identity and the boundaries of international engagement, with critics concerned the wording could reach beyond high-level policy into everyday civic and economic life.
While the NRM caucus has backed the measure, debate continues, with opponents warning that some provisions may affect legitimate civic activity and how businesses operate. That pushback, Misryoum reports, suggests the discussion is unlikely to fade before the parliamentary sitting.
Meanwhile, security around Parliament was visibly heightened on Tuesday morning. Police and other security agencies were deployed at different access points, and movement in and around the precincts was monitored closely.
Plainclothes and uniformed personnel were stationed at key entry routes as lawmakers prepared for what is expected to be a highly charged sitting.
This kind of heightened environment often signals that legislation tied to sovereignty can quickly become a wider test of public sentiment, not just a procedural vote.