APC says Peter Obi is chasing an easy ticket after he quit ADC, while Obi points to internal crises and toxic politics.
A sharp political jab followed Peter Obi’s exit from the African Democratic Congress, with the APC accusing him of shopping for an easier presidential path.
APC’s National Publicity Secretary, Felix Morka, reacted after Obi announced that he had resigned from the ADC.. In a post shared on X on Sunday, Morka described Obi as a “political rolling stone,” alleging he keeps moving across parties in pursuit of what he called a free presidential ticket.. The APC spokesman said Obi appears to want power without having to face internal contests within parties.
Morka’s criticism also framed the moves as a preference for a smooth route to the presidency rather than building sustained party structures.. He suggested Obi’s intention was to be placed on a ticket, “delivered only on a platter of gold,” and later tagged the former Anambra State governor a “political drifter.”
This exchange matters because it highlights how leadership ambitions are increasingly being measured not just by policy promises, but by perceived loyalty and political strategy.
Meanwhile, Obi had earlier explained his decision to leave the ADC, citing internal crises and what he described as a toxic political environment within the party.. In his statement shared on Sunday, he said his resignation followed deep reflection and ongoing challenges that, according to him, had distracted the party from addressing national issues.
Obi also sought to clarify that the exit was not rooted in personal disputes with key figures.. He said he still respects people including former Senate President David Mark and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, while indicating that disagreements and divisions inside the party were part of the broader context for his decision.
In the same remarks, Obi reiterated that he is not driven by desperation for political office.. He said his focus remains on improving the welfare of Nigerians and working toward building a more functional society, even as he reaffirmed his view that competent and compassionate leadership is possible.
For supporters and critics, the timing and framing of both positions may shape how voters interpret the credibility of future alliances and party transitions.
In the meantime, Misryoum reports that the disagreement adds to the wider noise around campaign calculations ahead of Nigeria’s next political cycle, with parties and prominent figures trading barbs over who is truly committed to building platforms rather than taking shortcuts.