Misryoum examines the belonging gap—how feeling unseen can quietly drive disengagement, and what schools can do to rebuild trust, voice, and inclusive learning.
A single moment of being noticed can change how a student shows up the next day.
Misryoum often hears educators talk about achievement gaps and learning loss. but the earliest form of falling behind is sometimes quieter: students stop trying before the grades start to drop.. The belonging gap shows up when students experience school as a place where they’re not fully known. not consistently valued. or not invited into the learning process.. In that space. learning turns transactional—complete the work. follow directions—without the confidence to ask questions. take risks. or connect what’s being taught to who they are.
The story is familiar in classrooms across systems: a student who arrives withdrawn. labeled “unmotivated. ” and gradually becomes harder to reach.. One teacher noticed the student’s notebook wasn’t empty or disengaged—it was full of drawings: architectural structures. futuristic cities. ideas rendered with care.. Instead of steering him back to the worksheet, the teacher asked about what he’d been sketching.. Within weeks, the same student wasn’t just participating; he was volunteering ideas and asking deeper questions.. The curriculum hadn’t changed.. The experience of being seen had.
That distinction matters, because belonging isn’t a “soft” add-on that comes after academics.. It’s a learning condition.. When students feel they belong. they’re more likely to persist through frustration. interpret feedback as useful rather than threatening. and keep showing up even when work is difficult.. When they don’t, they often try to disappear into compliance.. They may succeed short-term, but motivation drains—especially for students who learn differently or develop at different speeds.
Misryoum’s takeaway is straightforward: schools may think they’re measuring engagement, but they often miss what drives it.. In the national student engagement research referenced by Misryoum’s editorial analysis. only about half of students report feeling engaged. and engagement tends to drop as students get older.. Meanwhile. evidence from school connectedness research points to a strong link between feeling connected and better mental health and attendance outcomes.. The message behind those findings is not simply that students need encouragement; it’s that students need systems that reliably signal. “You’re here on purpose. and we recognize you.”
The belonging gap can be intensified by the way schools interpret struggle.. A student with ADHD may look distracted. yet what they actually need may be support with focus. movement. or task initiation.. If classrooms demand long stretches of stillness and one-size-fits-all pacing, frustration becomes a daily routine.. Over time, “unmotivated” can become the story the student believes about themselves.. Similarly, a student with dyslexia may avoid reading because reading has been exhausting and repeatedly punishing.. If support is limited to generic encouragement—“try harder”—the student’s internal conclusion can be devastating: I’m not capable.
The hopeful part is that belonging can be engineered through design.. Inclusive learning structures—such as chunked tasks. flexible pacing. movement options. accessible materials. or multiple ways to demonstrate understanding—don’t lower expectations.. They remove barriers that block real participation.. When those barriers come down, students experience something deeper than accommodation: they experience competence.. And competence is a powerful ingredient in belonging.
Schools seeking a starting point often ask the right questions, but they sometimes ask them too late.. Misryoum would frame it this way: belonging should show up in the daily mechanics of schooling—schedules. instructional routines. and how success is defined—not only in mission statements.. If a school’s approach to belonging is limited to a slogan. students will feel it as hollow. especially when they’re still singled out. rushed. or misread.
Practices that tend to build belonging are consistent across settings.. First, relationships are prioritized.. Educators make time to learn students’ strengths, interests, and learning needs, which strengthens trust and makes feedback land differently.. It can be as simple as a brief check-in at the start of class. or a follow-up to something a student shared previously.. Second, student voice is elevated.. Students are invited to influence how learning happens—through choices in how to demonstrate understanding. opportunities to co-create goals. or classroom routines that ask what would help them learn best.. Third, strengths are made visible.. Instead of only spotlighting deficits, schools highlight progress and competence in real time, helping students build identity around growth.
For school leaders. these aren’t just “nice-to-have” initiatives; they’re levers that determine whether students interpret school as supportive or as judgment.. Misryoum suggests beginning with a reality check: do educators have the tools, time, and support to create belonging consistently?. Which students feel connected, and which students are moving through classrooms unseen?. How flexible are learning structures when students struggle?. And are the school’s expectations designed to recognize diverse forms of intelligence and growth?
The payoff of closing the belonging gap is visible in behavior before it’s visible in test scores.. Students take more academic risks.. Teachers deepen their connections because they’re not guessing—they’re learning who students are.. Over time, engagement becomes less fragile, persistence becomes more durable, and achievement becomes easier to sustain.
When belonging is treated as a strategic priority. the school experience changes for students who were quietly falling behind in confidence long before they fell behind on assignments.. And when students feel that they truly belong. they stop asking whether they fit—and start asking what they’re capable of becoming.
Gus Mattammal’s bid for California superintendent: tutoring, data and access
DOJ Extends Website Accessibility Deadline: What It Means for Schools
Education Policy Round-Up: Strikes, AI, Enrollment Declines & Recess Bills