Trump and – Europe’s far-right allies are finding that closeness to Trump can backfire—shaking energy, trade, and even election strategy as EU leaders push back.
Donald Trump’s European partners in the far-right orbit are discovering a hard lesson: alignment with Washington doesn’t come with free protection.
For European governments already rattled by the energy shocks that followed Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. the prospect of renewed disruption in global oil and gas routes is a political problem. not just an economic one.. A prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz—something European officials fear could arrive as a sequel to the last crisis—would put pressure on inflation and public budgets again.. In that environment. any additional U.S.-driven turbulence quickly becomes a domestic political liability for leaders trying to sell stability to voters.
Misryoum has been tracking how Trump’s Gulf War—more broadly. his confrontational approach to foreign policy—has taken what was already a strained relationship with Europe to a new tipping point.. The conflict shows up not only in headline disputes. but in how European leaders are forced to manage cascading effects: energy security worries. the fear of economic “stagflationary” shocks. and the growing sense that Europe is being asked to absorb costs without receiving reciprocal restraint from the White House.
Energy and tariffs: the pressure hits at home
Energy and trade friction is where the political danger for Trump’s European sympathizers becomes most visible.. Europe’s far-right movements often market themselves as defenders of national interests. but the national-interest math changes when markets react to U.S.. decisions in ways that land directly on household prices and government spending.
At the same time. Trump’s approach to trade—described in European capitals as heavy-handed and “extortionate”—is feeding a wider fear that Washington’s demands will arrive alongside higher costs for Europe’s budgets.. That’s especially relevant as European countries confront the competing needs of higher defense spending and tighter fiscal space.. The result is a politically uncomfortable reality: even leaders who agree with Trump on culture-war themes may find themselves at odds with the policy outcomes that come from Washington’s negotiating style.
Hungary’s election is a warning to Trump allies
The clearest signal, Misryoum notes, comes from the rapid turn in Hungary’s domestic politics.. Viktor Orbán—once treated in Washington as an ideological ally—suffered a crushing electoral defeat.. His loss is being read across European capitals as a warning that overt closeness to Trumpist America can become a liability when voters feel economic stress.
Orbán’s replacement. Péter Magyar. may not be a liberal figure in any simple sense. but his campaign trajectory reflects a desire to reduce friction with the European Union after years of constant bickering.. Magyar’s position underscores a broader trend: parts of the continent’s hard right are beginning to prioritize workable EU-level outcomes over unconditional alignment with the White House.
That shift also undercuts a core Trump strategy in Europe—using personal affinity and ideological alignment as leverage.. If Hungary now signals it wants decision-making “easier” at the EU level and shows reluctance to block a new European financial lifeline for Kyiv. it’s a direct contrast with Trump’s public attacks on Europe’s Ukraine stance.. Even if the motivations are mixed—economic performance. EU relations. and election timing—the takeaway for Trump’s European orbit is straightforward: being seen as Washington’s client can cost votes.
Meloni and Farage feel the backdraft
Hungary is one chapter; the bigger story is how other far-right leaders are being pulled into an uncomfortable relationship with Trump’s unpredictability.. In the United Kingdom. Nigel Farage’s Reform UK has been openly distancing itself from the idea that proximity to Trump helps at the ballot box.. Farage’s frustration reflects a concern that Trumpism may not translate cleanly into electoral momentum in Europe. where voters increasingly weigh domestic credibility over ideological theater.
In Italy, Giorgia Meloni offered a different model—attempting to function as a bridge between Washington and Brussels.. She pushed for tempering some aspects of the European response to Trump-era tariffs. while still taking positions aligned with European expectations on Ukraine support.. But Misryoum observes that this middle approach is now colliding with Trump’s own demands.
Trump has publicly criticized Meloni after she refused to allow U.S.. strikes from Italian bases connected to the Iran confrontation.. The dispute carries a political message: European leaders who want the benefits of alignment may still be denied the freedom to manage their own national security choices.. Meloni’s subsequent security decisions—linked to the regional volatility involving Israel and the fallout for Italian personnel—show how quickly a Washington confrontation can produce risks on the ground.. In other words, it isn’t only diplomacy that changes; it’s military planning, alliances, and public accountability.
A practical test for the “anti-establishment” coalition
The political economy underneath these clashes matters.. For Trump, the promise of friendship is paired with a recurring theme: Europe pays.. That includes everything from higher tariff burdens to the expectation that European governments purchase American fossil fuels and weapons.. Even for leaders who would like to portray themselves as anti-bureaucratic and pro-sovereignty. the moment Washington ties security. energy. and investment to U.S.. leverage, sovereignty turns into a narrower, more expensive concept.
Misryoum also sees a second layer—technology and industrial dependence—that is harder to explain on campaign stages but easier to feel in policy meetings.. European digital and defense sectors increasingly rely on U.S.. technology.. That dependency limits how far nationalist rhetoric can go when negotiations move from values to contracts. from speeches to supply chains.
The 2027 French risk: ideology meets credibility
France’s situation illustrates the long-tail consequences.. As European politics moves toward a 2027 presidential contest, reports of U.S.. engagement with potential French political contenders reflect a familiar pattern: Washington tests whether it can influence outcomes through dialogue and investment promises.
The question for Europe’s far-right—especially the Rassemblement National—is not only whether it can win power. but whether it can credibly manage the policy constraints that come with it: stabilizing the economy. addressing high deficits. and convincing investors.. When U.S.. diplomats doubt that capacity, ideological affinity doesn’t automatically translate into policy trust.
That is where Trump’s alliance style may be doing long-term damage to his European sympathizers.. Even if they share rhetorical goals on immigration and culture. they still operate inside EU fiscal rules. energy markets. and security frameworks.. If Washington’s demands consistently raise costs without delivering stability, voters eventually notice the mismatch.
The honeymoon. Misryoum concludes. is ending not because the far-right has lost its political instinct—but because the economics and security math of Europe has little patience for performative alliance.. Bonhomie can be useful in press conferences. yet it doesn’t pay energy bills. balance budgets. or protect soldiers in contested regions.. For Trump’s European allies. the relationship is starting to look less like solidarity and more like a recurring bill arriving with every geopolitical spike.
Opinion | Maybe you should move from Alabama to California
Residency question leaves Harry Cohen unchallenged in Hillsborough race