Seahawks trade – With only four picks in the 2026 NFL Draft, Misryoum breaks down how far the Seahawks could trade back—and what it would cost them if they still want Jadarian Price.
Day 1 of the NFL Draft is here, and the Seattle Seahawks are set to make their first big decision with the No. 32 overall pick.
Seattle enters the event with momentum and a clear philosophy: maximize value.. John Schneider has already signaled the direction—he’s tipped that the Seahawks have four picks total and will be “looking to move back.” That matters because the Seahawks aren’t just trying to draft better; they’re trying to draft more.. In a league where premium talent is hard to find and depth can swing a season. trading down is often the draft-day version of hedging.
For Seattle, the immediate question is simple: how far back is too far?. Misryoum sees the most important answer tied to one player who has become the most discussed piece of the puzzle—Notre Dame running back Jadarian Price.. If Price is the target to replace Kenneth Walker III after his exit in free agency. then the trade-back strategy can’t be purely about adding picks.. It has to account for whether Seattle still gets the player they feel they need.
The trade-back case: value without losing the core
The Seahawks hold the draft’s last pick in the first round on Thursday night at No. 32. From there, a common path for teams with limited selections is to slide back and collect additional picks in the second and later rounds.
Daniel Jeremiah’s take. carried into the Seattle conversation. is that Price is a “big part of the equation” for how aggressive Seattle can be with its slide.. Misryoum’s interpretation is that the Seahawks’ front office likely wants the best of both worlds: additional draft assets while still keeping Price on the board.
In Jeremiah’s mock approach, Seattle would strike a deal with the Baltimore Ravens to move back to No.. 45 overall.. That kind of jump is meaningful—late first-round value can transform into early second-round flexibility—but it’s also not so steep that it guarantees losing a specific target.. It’s the draft equivalent of tightening your grip while still changing course.
What Seattle might still get in the 40s
If the Seahawks move back into the middle-to-late first-round range, what do they gain?. Jeremiah’s discussion points to a roster that is already “in a good roster position,” which changes the calculus.. When a team is built on quality starters. it can afford to draft for fit—players who complement what’s already strong.
Misryoum expects fans to focus on two categories that often dominate trade-down conversations: cornerback talent and edge-rusher athletic profiles.. Jeremiah suggested that even after a trade back to the mid-40s. Seattle could still find options that match needs around the defensive front and the secondary.. That matters because it’s easier to justify a trade when the board still provides credible starting-level prospects.
The names mentioned in the conversation included multiple defensive possibilities—players at corner and edge—with the broad point being that the pool of difference-makers may still be deep enough at No.. 45 to absorb a trade.. In other words: the Seahawks wouldn’t be trading away certainty. they’d be trading for probability. then using coaching and roster construction to turn it into production.
The Price risk: trading down can cost you the plan
The most delicate part of Seattle’s decision is the part that doesn’t show up in the trade chart. If Price truly is the plan to be the featured running back, then the draft becomes a countdown.
Jeremiah’s warning—summarized by Misryoum—was that pushing too far back could turn the position from “targeted” into “gone.” Trading down is a strategy, but targeting a specific player is a timeline. Once the board moves past a certain range, teams can’t control what happens next.
That’s why the trade question has an emotional edge.. Seahawks fans aren’t just watching draft math; they’re watching a new identity form.. Walker’s production and the team’s recent rhythm have left a mark on how fans expect the offense to look.. Price, if he’s the chosen successor, isn’t simply another running back prospect—he’s the next chapter.
If Seattle trades back into the 40s and Price slides off the board, the Seahawks would likely have to pivot quickly. Jeremiah described the response as taking as many extra picks as possible later—essentially shifting from “get the guy” to “build the room” if the original plan doesn’t land.
Why the Seahawks’ roster position makes this strategy plausible
There’s another layer that Misryoum thinks deserves attention: roster composition changes what trade-down means. Teams that are thin at multiple positions can’t afford to gamble. Teams that are already solid can trade for upside because they have a foundation to absorb outcomes.
Seattle’s willingness to move back suggests a belief that they can draft impact without needing to win the board at No. 32. That’s a subtle but important distinction. In an ideal scenario, trading down helps them add depth and fresh competition while still preserving the chance to secure Price.
If everything clicks, the Seahawks could end up with more draft capital and still land the player they want most. If it doesn’t, they’d rely on the volume of later selections to recreate the value they might have lost by chasing a specific outcome.
The real test won’t be the trade announcement. It will be what Seattle does when the board stops cooperating—and how quickly the front office turns uncertainty into a new plan.