Redwood Materials cuts 10% of staff to scale energy storage

Redwood Materials is laying off about 135 employees to streamline operations as it grows its energy storage business and pushes toward profitability.
Redwood Materials has begun a new round of layoffs, affecting about 135 employees—roughly 10% of its workforce—as the battery recycler reshapes itself around a faster-growing energy storage push.
The decision lands after a turbulent stretch for the battery supply chain, including recent restructuring across parts of the sector. In that environment, Redwood’s move is less about retreat and more about reallocating resources, according to a message shared with remaining staff.
Misryoum understands the layoffs came just five months after Redwood cut about 5% of its workforce and shortly after the company closed a $425 million funding round that valued it above $6 billion.. That timeline matters: workforce changes are often a lagging indicator of shifting strategy. demand expectations. and investor pressure to show progress beyond early-stage growth.
A central theme in Redwood’s internal messaging is that the company sees its materials segment moving toward profitability. while its energy storage business is building momentum.. Founder and CEO JB Straubel told employees that Redwood is “the strongest it’s ever been. ” framing the current cuts as a response to parts of the company growing faster than needed for its next phase.
Misryoum’s take: this is a classic scaling problem—what worked for rapid expansion can become expensive when the market environment tightens.. When companies pursue multiple paths at once. costs can rise in parallel. even if revenue from some lines takes longer to mature.. By reducing headcount across engineering and operations, Redwood is signaling that execution discipline is becoming as important as ambition.
The broader battery industry backdrop helps explain why Redwood is moving now.. Misryoum notes that competition and financing conditions have tightened for battery recyclers and related players.. Earlier this month, another battery recycler, Ascend Elements, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, citing “insurmountable” challenges.. At the same time, many battery makers have faced slower-than-expected demand as U.S.. automakers tempered earlier, more optimistic EV timelines.
For Redwood. the strategy appears to be two-track: keep advancing recycling. while using recycled materials as an input advantage for energy storage.. Redwood has announced deals involving Crusoe AI and. more recently. automaker Rivian. aimed at supplying recycled batteries that can power facilities.. Those partnerships point to a business model where recycled material can be monetized not only as a commodity. but also through longer-term industrial relationships tied to operations.
Misryoum also expects employees to weigh this moment differently depending on what they worked on.. For teams aligned with the company’s “most focused” critical projects, the message of continuity may feel reassuring.. For those impacted. the immediate concern becomes financial stability and continuity of skills—hence the emphasis on severance. paid health benefits. and career transition support mentioned in internal communication.
Analytically, layoffs are rarely the story by themselves; the story is what they protect.. Redwood’s CEO suggested the company has adapted successfully to market changes that have “bankrupted many” competitors.. If that claim holds. the cuts may reduce burn rate. improve margins in the materials business. and accelerate execution in energy storage—areas where investors increasingly want proof of unit economics. not just capacity.
In the near term. the key question for Misryoum readers is whether energy storage growth can absorb the cost reductions without slowing delivery.. If Redwood can translate its partnerships and roadmap into steady revenue. the company could emerge with a leaner structure better suited to a more selective market.. If growth takes longer, the layoffs could become a warning sign rather than a reset.
Either way. Redwood’s approach reflects a sector-wide reality: the battery value chain is being rebuilt for a slower. more cost-conscious phase. where integration. profitability. and operational focus determine who survives.. Redwood is betting it can stay ahead by shrinking to fit its future—then scaling again from a stronger foundation.
Apple’s new CEO: hardware brain, software test ahead
Apple leadership shift: John Ternus steps toward CEO role after Tim Cook exit