A pro-Ed Markey super PAC aired an ad alleging Seth Moulton ‘thanked ICE.’ The challenger has repeatedly criticized ICE, calling it beyond repair and pushing reforms—or abolition.
A pro-Ed Markey super PAC is trying to frame Democratic challenger Rep. Seth Moulton as an ICE ally, using a targeted slice of a House resolution and dramatic footage tied to immigration enforcement.
The Commonwealth Together PAC aired an ad saying Moulton “thanked ICE” and portrayed him as supporting a practice the ad depicts as terrorizing communities.. The claim points to one sentence in a 417-word resolution that expressed “gratitude” to law enforcement officers, including U.S.. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel, for protecting the homeland.
But Moulton. the representative Markey’s opponents are challenging for the Democratic nomination in Massachusetts. has spent much of his political career attacking how ICE functions and how it is used.. In his view. the agency has moved beyond constitutional boundaries into something he describes as “state-sponsored terror. ” a stance that collides with the PAC’s effort to reduce his record to a single phrase.
The ad also leans on emotion and imagery.. It displays a 2025 TV clip captioned as ICE agents violently detaining a Worcester mother and daughter. an incident involving ICE taking custody of a Brazilian woman while local police arrested her teenage daughter.. The PAC also includes earlier footage of federal agents killing Alex Pretti in Minneapolis. presenting a pattern of lethal enforcement alongside its central message about ICE’s direction.
The PAC’s argument. however. hinges on selective emphasis: it cites only one of two antisemitism-related House resolutions that Moulton backed in June 2025. even though both condemned violence tied to antisemitic hatred.. The version that mentions ICE explicitly focuses on gratitude for law enforcement. while the other resolution similarly condemns antisemitic violence but does not name ICE.
To understand why that matters politically, you have to look at what resolutions are often used for on Capitol Hill.. They can be routine statements of condemnation that include broader language acknowledging categories of law enforcement. even when the main legislative purpose is narrower—like denouncing a specific attack and calling for action.. In practice. that can create openings for opponents to pull out a single line. wrap it in footage. and suggest an entire worldview.
Moulton addressed the criticism directly. arguing that supporting the resolution’s purpose—condemning antisemitic terror—does not mean agreeing with every word in the measure.. He said there rarely exists a bill or resolution that matches his position perfectly word-for-word.. In the same statement. he also said he would “loudly oppose” what he describes as President Donald Trump’s desire to “weaponize ICE” and create fear among immigrant communities.
This is not a new theme in Moulton’s message.. Over the years. he has called for major changes to ICE. including proposals to enable lawsuits for constitutional violations by federal officers. and he has urged conditions on any continued funding for the agency.. More starkly. he has said ICE is “beyond repair” and “obviously needs to be abolished. ” positioning his stance at the far end of the Democratic debate over enforcement.
The political stakes for Markey’s allies are clear: ICE has become one of the sharpest cultural and policy flashpoints in national politics. and it is also an issue that travels well in ads—especially when paired with viral images and allegations of excessive force.. For Moulton, the risk is that opponents can try to collapse complex voting records into a single soundbite.
A resolution line becomes an election attack line
Moulton’s record: criticize. reform. or end ICE
Why the ad strategy matters for Massachusetts Democrats
At the center of the conflict is a basic mismatch: the PAC tries to paint Moulton as grateful to ICE. while he argues his political identity is built around opposing how ICE is used. including what he describes as violence and fear inflicted on immigrants.. In a race where every ad aims to define character. that disagreement may be more consequential than the resolution sentence itself.
DOJ Settlement for Colony Ridge Offers No Victim Pay, Critics Say
Oil tankers head to Hormuz—can the risk be priced?
Strait of Hormuz: Diplomacy vs. Risk as U.S. Signals Confidence