Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) has had one of those awkward stretches where the numbers look like they should mean something—and they do—but the story still feels unfinished. Shares are down 19% year-to-date, and also down more than 1% over the year. Not exactly a confidence booster, especially when the conversation keeps circling back to Copilot.
Jim Cramer has talked about the company several times over the past couple of months, and the tone hasn’t been particularly celebratory. The hot point: Copilot AI software, which he says is struggling to attract users. That’s the kind of concern that travels fast, because it’s not only about product performance—it’s about whether investors believe the AI bet can actually convert.
Misryoum newsroom reported that Goldman Sachs weighed in on Microsoft’s shares on the 6th. The rating stayed at Buy, and the internal logic sounded familiar: the recent share price movement already appeared to account for much of the risk. Benchmark, which initiated coverage on the 1st, also landed on Buy—but with a $450 share price target attached. Their take was that the recent weakness may actually be the buying opportunity people keep looking for, basically suggesting sentiment is ahead of fundamentals.
Then there’s the part where Cramer talked about Goldman’s “sum of the parts” angle—Azure, Xbox, and the whole idea of breaking the company up as a way to make the valuation seem clearer. He said, “How about sum of the parts? Look at this, Goldman Sachs with a sum of the, what are they gonna, break it up? Yeah, let’s break it up, let’s break it up into Azure and Xbox! . . .To tell you the truth, I thought it was so absurd I didn’t finish it.” It’s not a subtle line, and you can almost feel the room shift when he drops it.
Meanwhile, Misryoum editorial desk noted that Mar Vista U.S. Quality Strategy discussed Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) in its Q1 2026 investor letter. The letter pointed to pressure on the stock in Q1, tied to investors worrying about the rising costs needed to fund Microsoft’s accelerating AI infrastructure build-out in 2026. There was also that expectation issue around Azure growth—after the December quarter earnings report, Azure revenue grew “only” 39% year over year, and the market didn’t exactly look forgiving.
Misryoum analysis indicates the bigger question underneath everything is return on investment. Investors are increasingly skeptical about whether the large, rapidly expanding capital expenditures tied to AI infrastructure will pay off. And sure, Microsoft’s argument—at least in the letter—leans on cash flow and positioning: the belief that the company is well set to support growth through strong and expanding operating cash flows. The letter also mentions Microsoft’s meaningful exposure to OpenAI, but suggests OpenAI’s ability to raise over $100 billion should help ease worries about meeting large contractual commitments. One moment that stuck for me, weirdly, was the sound of an office heater clicking on as I reread the paragraph about cash flows—little background noise while the bigger debate stayed loud.
The letter doesn’t ignore demand. It claims Microsoft is experiencing strong growth in Azure, its hyperscale cloud platform, and that Azure is capacity constrained. It also says adoption of Copilot is increasing across its enterprise customer base. Then it lands on a longer-term view: that Microsoft should be able to generate attractive long-term returns from the OpenAI partnership and monetize generative AI through its expanding suite of Copilot and AI-enabled products across its global enterprise IT footprint. But whether Copilot can win over enough users quickly enough… that’s still the uneasy part. And honestly, that’s the part that keeps pulling the whole conversation back to the same place, again and again, like it doesn’t fully trust its own ending.
Meta locks in 1GW AI chips with Broadcom as Hock Tan exits board
Western United Cup returns to Geelong, eyes July Tarneit event