Galamsey Fight: Expert Urges Due Process for Mining Allegations

Mining consultant Wisdom Gomashie calls for adherence to regulatory frameworks instead of public targeting in the ongoing fight against illegal mining in Ghana.
The ongoing national discourse regarding the fight against illegal mining, popularly known as ‘galamsey’, has taken a new turn as stakeholders debate the fairness of public accusations leveled against high-profile individuals.
Mining consultant Wisdom Gomashie has urged the public and regulatory bodies to prioritize due process when addressing allegations linked to Bernard Antwi Boasiako, commonly known as Chairman Wontumi.. Speaking recently on the matter, Gomashie emphasized that the Ashanti Regional Chairman of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) operates within the sphere of large-scale mining, which is governed by a distinct legal framework compared to small-scale, often illicit, operations.. According to Gomashie, the distinction between these two categories of mining is critical to ensuring that legal actions remain grounded in fact rather than political or public speculation.
Distinguishing Large-Scale from Small-Scale Operations
The core of Gomashie’s argument lies in the legal classification of mining licenses.. He clarified that Wontumi holds a license for large-scale operations, meaning his activities are subject to the strict oversight of the Minerals Commission and established mining laws, including Act 703 and LI 218(2).. Gomashie insisted that if environmental infractions occur, the remedy should be sought through the specific enforcement mechanisms provided by these laws.. By keeping the focus on regulatory procedures, he argues that the state can maintain a standard of fairness that prevents individual reputations from being tarnished by generalized anger directed at the mining sector.
The International Standard of Regulatory Enforcement
Comparing Ghana’s approach to international benchmarks, Gomashie highlighted how the mining industry handles compliance globally.. Large multinational firms, he noted, are rarely subjected to aggressive public campaigns or premature arrests for regulatory breaches.. Instead, national inspectorate divisions typically issue fines or mandate corrective measures to ensure compliance.. He questioned why the expectation for domestic miners should be inherently different, suggesting that the Minerals Commission is well-equipped to manage infractions through fines and administrative correction rather than opting for immediate punitive, public-facing action.
Contextualizing the Broader Impact
The intensity surrounding the galamsey debate often stems from a deep-seated public frustration with the degradation of the country’s water bodies and forest reserves.. When individuals perceive that justice is moving too slowly, or that certain figures are shielded from scrutiny, the public demand for immediate accountability naturally spikes.. However, legal experts warn that reacting to this pressure by bypassing due process can set a dangerous precedent that undermines the rule of law..
Misryoum notes that the tension between urgent environmental protection and the protection of legal rights remains one of the most complex challenges facing the current administration.. While the public’s emotional response is fueled by the visible destruction of the landscape, the technical requirements of mining law provide the only stable path toward sustainable regulation.. By focusing on the inspectorate’s role in verifying compliance, the government may find a more sustainable way to manage the industry, rather than relying on public sentiment to drive enforcement decisions.
Ultimately, the call for due process is a call for systemic strength.. If mining laws are robust, their application should be consistent, regardless of the individual’s political affiliation or public standing.. As the debate continues, the effectiveness of the Minerals Commission in applying these corrective measures without bias will likely be the primary benchmark for whether the fight against illegal mining is viewed as a genuine pursuit of environmental justice or a tool for selective targeting.