Chronic absences in early grades linked to higher transfer risk

chronic absence – New California research finds kids chronically absent in K–3—especially Black students and students experiencing homelessness—are about twice as likely to switch districts, and the problem often follows them.
A child missing early school days may be sending a warning sign that something bigger is disrupting their education.
K–3 attendance problems can predict student moves
New California research reviewed state data from 2022–23 and 2023–24 and found that students who are chronically absent in kindergarten through third grade—defined as missing at least 10% of the school year—are about twice as likely to change school districts as students who do not miss that amount.
The key message is not just that chronic absenteeism harms classroom learning. Misryoum’s take on the findings is that chronic absence in the earliest grades may also be a marker of instability that travels with a family, leading to higher rates of district transfers later on.
What the study suggests about why transfers happen
The study points to a pattern: attendance struggles tend to persist after students move. meaning a transfer doesn’t automatically reset the conditions driving absences.. In interviews-style analysis. researchers emphasized that early chronic absence can reflect barriers outside a child’s control—such as housing or transportation challenges.
That matters for educators because a district often treats transfer events as a logistical update, not a continuity problem.. If attendance-related needs aren’t communicated when students switch districts. the receiving school may be forced to rediscover what’s been going wrong—while the student keeps missing school.
Misryoum notes that this is where attendance becomes more than a compliance metric. It becomes an early indicator that schools should connect families to supports quickly, especially when instability is already evident.
Pandemic-era increases and who is most affected
Chronic absenteeism rose sharply during the pandemic, climbing from 12.1% in 2018–19 to 30% in 2021–22. Although it has come down since then, improvements have slowed. In the most recent year included in the new data snapshot—2024–25—about 19% of California students were chronically absent.
The research also highlights a particularly alarming shift among the youngest students. The share of students who were chronically absent in both kindergarten and first grade more than doubled after the pandemic, rising from about 6% in 2017–2018 to over 15% in 2022–23.
Disparities appear stark in K–3.. Black students with chronic absences in K–3 showed transfer rates around 16.7%. and students experiencing homelessness faced elevated transfer rates as well.. The pattern is similarly elevated where multiple risk factors intersect. with the study reporting even higher transfer likelihood when chronic absenteeism and homelessness overlap.
Misryoum’s editorial read is that this is less about blaming students or families and more about exposing how unevenly instability hits communities.. When the school calendar becomes hard to keep up with—because getting to school is difficult. needs are unmet. or routines are disrupted—attendance and mobility move together.
Why early warning signals should change how districts respond
One of the researchers’ central recommendations is that attendance staff and homeless liaisons should work together, not separately.. The logic is straightforward: if basic needs like transportation. housing stability. or food insecurity are limiting school access. then attendance teams can’t solve the problem alone.
Misryoum also flags the policy gap implied by the findings: if districts don’t share relevant attendance context during transfers. the receiving district may miss an opportunity to prevent further disruption.. Researchers point out that there is no standard protocol that consistently ensures attendance challenges are communicated as students move.
This is particularly important because the study suggests that the chances of being chronically absent again increase after changing districts, and the probability rises further for students facing socioeconomic disadvantage, homelessness, English learner status, or migration-related challenges.
The practical impact for families and classrooms
For families already under pressure. missing school can create a cycle: absences lead to more academic strain. which can increase stress and make engagement harder.. For schools, the consequences extend beyond individual grades.. District transfers can disrupt instruction, relationships, and continuity in support services.
Misryoum’s newsroom perspective is that chronic absenteeism in the earliest grades deserves faster attention precisely because young children need stable routines to learn basic literacy. numeracy. and classroom expectations.. When attendance problems start early and persist—even through a move—the educational cost compounds.
The study also indicates a “spectrum” of absenteeism. Some students miss just enough days to cross the 10% threshold, while others miss far more. That range is important for outreach: the level of absence should shape the intensity of support offered.
What Misryoum thinks should happen next
Misryoum’s key takeaway is that attendance must be treated as a coordinated, cross-system issue, not a single-school responsibility.. The research recommends prevention and targeted districtwide strategies. including engaging families about the importance of kindergarten attendance as an early intervention measure.
In practical terms, the findings suggest districts should look at K–3 attendance data as an early warning system for student mobility. When a transfer is unavoidable, schools should be ready to hand off attendance context and connected services, especially for students experiencing homelessness.
The broader implication is clear: fixing chronic absence may require solving the barriers that cause it—and those barriers often don’t end when a student leaves one campus.. The new research strengthens the case for building bridges between education and the social services that families rely on. so that stability doesn’t depend on which school a child happens to start in.