Misryoum explains how teachers can move beyond rote memorization with orthographic mapping, marking, and writing practice for high-frequency and irregular words.
Teaching early reading is often described as a race toward fluency—sounds, blending, and then sentences that finally start to “click.” Yet for many classrooms, a stubborn bottleneck appears sooner than teachers expect: the words students meet constantly, but don’t always decode in the usual way.
At the heart of this challenge are high-frequency words—some decodable, others temporarily irregular, and a smaller portion permanently irregular.. Misryoum highlights five classroom-tested strategies that follow the Science of Reading principle: even when words don’t match expectations at first glance. instruction should still help students understand why the word works the way it does. not simply memorize how it looks.
Misryoum also suggests clarifying the labels, because the term matters for instruction.. High-frequency words are the common ones children see repeatedly in early texts.. Fry words and Dolch words are list-based sets derived from frequently occurring printed English.. “Temporarily irregular” words may feel inconsistent before students learn the relevant phonics rule; once that rule is taught. the word becomes decodable.. “Permanently irregular” words never fully follow expected letter-sound patterns. so learners may need explicit instruction that still builds structure—what sounds can be mapped. what patterns can be taught. and what part truly remains irregular.
The most practical shift for educators is moving from one-off exposure to structured, repeated thinking.. Orthographic mapping is a strong starting point because it trains students to break a word down by sounds. not by guesswork from its appearance.. In Misryoum’s approach, students “connect the word” through phoneme segmentation while they sort the graphemes.. Using chips. connecting cubes. colored boxes. or colored ink. learners can separate each sound. then link the visual spellings to what they hear.. It reduces the temptation to treat the word as a memorization task and instead makes the word feel decodable—even when it initially looks tricky.
A second strategy is to hunt for the target words in a meaningful text, not only in isolation.. After teaching one or two words explicitly, students can scan a decodable passage or familiar reading material and locate them.. Misryoum sees this as more than retrieval practice: it supports recognition in real language. encourages attention to how words function inside sentences. and gives students motivation to apply their knowledge to comprehension.. When students find the word in context. they also start to build a mental bridge between decoding skill and fluent reading.
Third, adding a kinesthetic component can strengthen learning—especially for children who struggle to sustain attention during purely verbal lessons.. Misryoum emphasizes movements that align with sound structure: tapping out phonemes on the arm. tracing letter shapes while saying the matching sounds. or using simple hand motions to represent each sound in a word.. The goal is not to “act out” language for entertainment.. It’s to tie motor memory to auditory and visual input so that word structure becomes more retrievable later.
Another powerful tool is marking, which helps students pay attention to the internal architecture of irregular words.. With word marking. teachers guide learners through each letter while students label what it “should” sound like versus what it actually sounds like.. Misryoum describes using symbols—such as an indicator for the expected vowel pattern or an X/heart-like marker for letters that diverge from the standard pattern.. This matters because it replaces vague memorization with a clear map of what’s predictable. what isn’t. and when learning can change a word from “irregular” into “decodable.” A word like the. for instance. becomes more manageable once learners understand the th digraph; marking helps students track that progress over time.
Finally, use the words in writing so students must produce them, not just recognize them.. Misryoum notes that reading success can stall when students can identify a word but cannot spell it accurately.. Sentence construction in journals. shared writing. or guided practice forces retrieval: learners must access the same mapping they used in reading and apply it to spelling.. Pattern books built around target words can add structure and repetition without turning practice into empty drills—children write meaningful sentences such as “I like. ” “You can. ” or “The dog and cat are. ” reinforcing word form through real language.
For Misryoum, the broader takeaway is that irregular-word instruction doesn’t have to contradict phonics—it can complement it.. When teachers explicitly teach the sound-based logic (and clearly signal the few parts that truly don’t follow). students gain automaticity faster and with less reliance on visual guessing.. Over time. high-frequency and irregular words stop feeling like obstacles and start acting like stepping stones. helping early readers access richer texts with growing confidence.
Public charge fears hit California early childhood programs
What’s in and out in literacy instruction for 2026
More women in California school leadership—yet key gaps persist