Trump ignores concerns on missiles, enrichment, Iran funds

Advertisement oopStory continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Subscribe $1 for 6 months Advertisement 2AdvertisementThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Article contentTrump shrugged off that idea at the press conference marking the end of a G7 summit in Evian, France. He even derided those offering him advice — he referred to them as “guys I like” — as focusing on the wrong thing with the fixation on ballistic missiles. “I mean, they have to
have some because other people have some,” Trump said.Article content“Missiles aren’t the problem,” Trump told reporters. “They hurt a little location but they don’t blow up the planet.”Article contentThe president took the same approach with nuclear enrichment. For years, he and many Republican critics of Iran have questioned why it should be allowed to enrich uranium if, as it insists, it doesn’t want a nuclear weapon. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Fox News in May that Iran needs to “walk away from enrichment.”Article contentWith
Rubio standing right behind him on Wednesday, Trump made clear he no longer agreed.Article content“It’s a little hard when other people have it, other adjoining states have it, and you’re not letting them have it for purposes of electricity and things like that,” Trump said. “You have to use a little common sense.”Article contentThe third red line Trump crossed centered on Iran’s frozen assets. The country has billions of dollars in overseas accounts that the U.S. has blocked banks from releasing. Part of the justification
for years has been that Iran is a leading state sponsor of terrorism, funding proxy groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, and can’t be trusted not to do so again.Article contentArticle content“It’s not our money, it’s their money — and we froze it at a certain point in time,” Trump said. “I guess we’re going to have to give it back, you know. If we didn’t give it back, nobody would ever invest in the dollar again.”Article contentThat idea met with
strong opposition from some of the president’s most ardent supporters including Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican.Article content“History teaches us giving billions of dollars to theocratic lunatics who want to murder us is not a good idea,” Cruz said in an interview.Article contentOur website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.Article content Latest from Shopping Essentials Windows to the world: Three of Europe’s most spectacular journeys
Norway, Switzerland and Germany offer breathtaking vistas by train and boat, writes Rick Steves 6 hours ago Travel Mom-tested and approved: 10 baby sleep products that actually work Building your first baby registry is one of the most exciting and overwhelming parts of preparing for a new baby. 8 hours ago Kids I slept on a $3,000+ organic mattress for 30 days — here’s my honest verdict The full breakdown of the Essentia Grateful Eight Organic Mattress 11 hours ago Sleep Advertisement 3Story continues belowThis
advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. I tried a $700 ergonomic office chair to fix my “shrimp slump” — here’s how it went 10+ years of hunching over my laptop finally caught up with me 1 day ago Home Living Silk & Snow’s biggest sale of the season is on now: shop beds, sofas and linens Save big on sofas, bed frames, bedding and more 1 day ago Deals Featured Local Savings
Donald Trump, G7, Evian, Iran, ballistic missiles, nuclear enrichment, Marco Rubio, frozen assets, Hezbollah, Hamas, Ted Cruz
So basically he’s like “it’s fine” lol.
I don’t get it, if missiles “don’t blow up the planet” then why is everyone so scared all the time? Also enrichment for electricity?? like… electricity is always the excuse.
Wait, I thought the whole point was stop Iran from having any enrichment. Now he’s saying other people already have it so they should too? That sounds backwards. And “frozen assets” like isn’t that just punishing people who live there? idk.
“Guys I like”?? Come on. I’m sorry but calling it not a problem is wild when Hezbollah and Hamas are mentioned in the same breath. Plus missiles hurt a location?? ok sure, tell that to whoever’s location gets hurt. This is gonna age terribly.